User talk:Goofywiki

Welcome!

Hello, Goofywiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Vital Farms

Hi Goofywiki,

I noticed you created the Vital Farms article and also uploaded a file the appears to be a picture you took. Are you associated with the business in some form? If you do work there, you likely have a conflict of interest for editing in the topic (see WP:COI). If you are just a customer or otherwise unassociated, please be mindful of WP:NOTPROMOTION where we try to avoid material that can be promotional and just stick to facts. We also try to avoid flowery language especially when describing people or businesses. If you have any questions, I'd be happy to help if I can. (talk) 14:02, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kingofaces43

Thanks for dropping the note. I do not work for nor am I associated with the company. I had the opportunity to visit the site and saw what they were doing and the importance of their company. I did upload a photo, but haven't put it on the article as I may want to replace it with others I have. I thought the article was pretty fact based and I made a point to use references whenever I stated something that was a claim or sorts. I am not really seeing too much flowery language. If you feel there is a violation, please let me know I will fix it right away. Thanks again for your input. --Goofywiki (talk) 14:17, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Some words can be used as puffery when describing companies (often unintentionally too). Things like "The company is widely considered a leader", "Vital Farms boasts", "The company has been awarded an exemplary score" are in the Vital Farms article (and in the reverted edit a bit). Another issue is that it's somewhat difficult to justify listing a specific company in an article about a broader topic they are involved in (such as the poultry article). If you list one, what keeps us from listing every other company with a claim to fame out there? It's a question of WP:WEIGHT, which is basically how we decide if content should be include and to what degree of representation. Personally I'm of the opinion that there's not strong evidence to include weight about Vital Farms in the pastured poultry article (as the last edit was presented at least), but that's a question to discuss on the article talk page if you want to pursue that further. Kingofaces43 (talk) 15:03, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GAB^gab 01:44, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock requests

If you wish this account to be unblocked, you must make the request from this account. That is, you must sign in as Goofywiki and make a request. Note also that you have already claimed you are writing on behalf of your client, so claiming you have no affiliation whatsoever, that just won't fly. We know you've been violating WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO, and need to honestly address this in any unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 12:36, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Goofywiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello --Yamla - thank you for your attention. As I mentioned, I do not have any affiliation with this company. I am not sure why you are saying that I previously said they are my client. I understand you are saying I am blocked for violated promotion or paid writing, but I say again, that is simply not the case. Can you please show me a reference where you are reading this? An admin Kingofaces43 had already reviewed this article, asked me about these issues, was kind enough to explain some things to me and seems to have cleared it. I am not sure why, two years later, my account is being blocked and this article flagged. This seems malicious. If I have violated any rules in writing, or coding, I am sorry for this due to my lack of experience and will pay closer attention next time, should I decide to write another article. I look forward to your next instruction, with thanks. Goofywiki (talk) 13:38, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The issue is however, there is a clear indication that you DO have a relationship with Vital Farms, as proven by Yamla below. I would agree that there is no reason to unblock you at this time. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:10, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

See, here's the problem I have with your claim that you have no affiliation with Vital Farms. You uploaded File:Vital_Farm's_pasture-raised_hens_enjoy_108_sq_ft_of_space.jpg on 2014-10-02, claiming you took this photo with your camera, and you are the copyright holder. Only... that image is from here. It was apparently uploaded by them in 2014-04. So, you have previously claimed that you are indeed affiliated with Vital Farms. Combine that with your previous violations, and I'm not seeing a way we can unblock you. --Yamla (talk) 14:42, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I’m not an admin nor did I “clear” anything as Goofywiki suggests. I pretty much just cautioned about COI and left it there not knowing this history of the user. Seeing what appears to be deceptive comments as you’ve pointed out, the block seems appropriate. Kingofaces43 (talk) 15:00, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Vital Farm's pasture-raised hens enjoy 108 sq ft of space.jpg

The file File:Vital Farm's pasture-raised hens enjoy 108 sq ft of space.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Likely copyright violation by blocked COI editor per: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Goofywiki&diff=813061385&oldid=813061309

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kingofaces43 (talk) 20:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Donni 1

The article Donni 1 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ENT and written with almost entirely unsourced/poor sourced promotional fluff. Nothing worth salvaging.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kingofaces43 (talk) 20:49, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vital Farms

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vital Farms, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kingofaces43 (talk) 22:00, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]