User talk:Goodnightfilm

Orphaned non-free media (Image:OST1B.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:OST1B.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 03:27, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AD-Calvo-in-2007.jpg

Hi did you take this pic?Genisock2 (talk) 15:31, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What about reuse by other people?Genisock2 (talk) 21:07, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Hands Resist Him

I removed the link because it was inapropriate in it's placement. Wikipedia articles are not supposed to contain links of mentions of article topics. Technically, all such lists are supposed to be deleted and when they become contentious, they often are summarily deleted. I removed it because it seemed likely that it's inclusion in the first place was an act of self-promotion. If you are, however, not involved with the film in any way, you may want to add in a properly worded statement of fact that the film features the painting and in what capacity. Then, you you can link to the film's web page as a reference for the fact you are asserting. That would be the proper and encyclopedic way to do it. Wikpedia articles are meant to convey, first and foremost, information about their subjects and not a series of links to tangentially related matter. I hope this clears things up. LiPollis (talk) 06:14, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your thanks - you're most welcome. A good rule of thumb for edits is to try and remember that whenever you can, phrase the information you want included as a statement of fact and use the link you want to include as the citation that backs that fact up. It makes it less likely that a real hard-line editor who comes along will delete it if he/she sees an offsite link to a film and concludes that it had to be put there as self-promotion. I'm not actually a deletionist or a hard-line editor but articles on the paranormal can quickly accumulate lists of mentions in this that or the other thing. As a rational skeptic, I feel paranormal articles deserve space but we have some activist skeptics who would like to see all articles on small but interesting (to some) subjects such as the painting be deleted. When paranormal articles start collecting odd bits of trivia or what is perceived as self-promotion, they use that as an excuse to nominate the article for deletion.

It took me a while to get a handle on the ever-changing preferred methods of citing facts and data and I still don't get it right all the time so don't be discouraged. if you need help inserting references to support facts you'd like included elsewhere, leave me a message on my talk page with the link and what you'd you'd like to say in what article and I'll try and help.LiPollis (talk) 12:39, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:OST1A.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:OST1A.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:25, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hadley Media

A tag has been placed on Hadley Media, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 18:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Melancholy Fantastic

The article The Melancholy Fantastic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Independent film of questionable notability. No independent or verifiable third party sources provided. Appears to fail WP:NFF

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 18:18, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:MFOneSheetConcept.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:MFOneSheetConcept.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:08, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:HOD-Teaser-Poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:HOD-Teaser-Poster.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:08, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello, Goodnightfilm. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:27, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:27, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm willing to unblock you (your name suggests that you are Calvo himself), but I'd like to request that you not edit articles about yourself or your own movies. The reason for this is that because you have a strong conflict of interest, some of your edits have come across as somewhat promotional in tone. For example, in one of the articles you appear to cherry pick quotes out of a review to make things seem as positive as possible, hence the promotion angle since you obviously benefit from having the reviews appear as positive as possible. I'm going to try to add sourcing and such where I can, but I can't caution you enough about editing articles about yourself- a few of people have done this and received a lot and I repeat a LOT of criticism about editing their own articles. I hope I don't sound overly harsh when I say that, but people have received a lot of backlash about things of that nature. You can still do small edits like tweaking dates and adding images, but offhand adding reviews to your articles should be something that you avoid. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:27, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Goodnightfilm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

adcalvo67 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Yes. I'm A.D. Calvo. Didn't know you should not use a company name as a user id. Won't edit my articles. I'm I doing this right?

Decline reason:

No response - as per WP:GAB this person, no matter what ID they're using - should not be violating WP:COI and WP:PROMO. the panda ₯’ 09:26, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, then, what would you edit? Daniel Case (talk) 15:40, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MFOneSheetConcept.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MFOneSheetConcept.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:26, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]