User talk:Goodfaith1

January 2011

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Independent Greens of Virginia, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. I could add other notices, including addition of non-neutral content and unverified content. Please don't make a mockery out of Wikipedia by turning your party's article into a full-color brochure. It begs the question of who you are and where this account came from, all of a sudden. Drmies (talk) 03:47, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Independent Greens of Virginia, you may be blocked from editing. I've explained before what the COI is here: you may NOT remove this tag until the issue is resolved--it's vandalism and it will get you blocked. Drmies (talk) 04:02, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GailforRail for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Drmies (talk) 04:08, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of PonchoChet (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid ^(Talk) 16:43, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]