User talk:Gonzapalot

Section deletion

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from List of major Konoha teams. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as the text has been restored from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You Can 't See Me! 00:09, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sai's article no longer exists. It is now a redirect back to the List of major Konoha teams page. Cease removing his information from that page, or it will be considered vandalism. You Can 't See Me! 00:16, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sai(Naruto)

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Sai(Naruto), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Rodhullandemu (talk - contribs) 00:19, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Shinoaburamenarutoanime.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Shinoaburamenarutoanime.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:35, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Hidan42.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Hidan42.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 20:27, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. While everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your contributions, such as your recent edit to James Loney (baseball), did not appear to be constructive and was automatically reverted by DASHBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
DASHBot produces few false positives, but they do happen. If you believe the bot has reverted your edit wrongly, it is helpful if you report the error so the bot does not make the same mistake again. Please:

Click here to submit a false positive report.
Edit this page and remove this message.

Thanks, DASHBot Anti-Vandalism (talk) 18:32, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page James Loney (baseball). Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Kgasso (talk) 18:36, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with your recent edit to Jimmy Wales, you will be blocked from editing.

Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted by DASHBot.

DASHBot produces few false positives, but they do happen. If you believe the bot has reverted your edit wrongly, it is helpful if you report the error so the bot does not make the same mistake again. Please:

Click here to submit a false positive report.
Edit this page and remove this message.

Thanks, DASHBot Anti-Vandalism (talk) 19:07, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

April 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jimmy Wales. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 21:13, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Berean Hunter, you may be blocked from editing. WikiPuppies! (bark) 21:19, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

WikiPuppies! (bark) 21:23, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gonzapalot (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was a severe vandal in the past, and I'm not going to deny that. I want to come back and legitimately contribute to Wikipedia. If you could unblock me, that would be nice. Gonzapalot 23:51, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Given how you feel about this project and its creator, based on what you've said in edits that were such garbage that they have been removed from public view, I fail to see what you have to contribute here. --Kinu ^t/_c 00:30, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gonzapalot (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Those edits were back in April. I no longer feel that way about the project. I promise I will make constructive edits if I get unblocked. Gonzapalot 05:12, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The edits for which you were blocked were not even simple vandalism, they were a deliberate attck on wikipedia. Apart from the obvious fact that you have been prevented from editing here, what has happened to change your opinion?--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:36, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gonzapalot (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Back in April, I made very offensive edits. I'm not denying that. I promise that I will stop attacking and vandalizing Wikipedia in this manner, as it is not moral to attack innocent individuals for no reason. If I am unblocked, I will contribute by removing vandalism, giving suggestions for improving articles, and possibly even creating articles. Gonzapalot 22:25, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Temporary decline - please follow the instructions left by Phantomsteve below. Once you're done and you'd like us to see what you've done, put up a new unblock request and we'll review your case then. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 23:01, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am not going to comment twice on your unblock rquesdt: this this not ideal tecnique. But I would ask the reviewing admin to note that you have not answered my question. Why is it not moral now, when it was moral in April?--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:34, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was not moral in April, but I ignored that fact. I was being a complete jerk, and I feel bad about it, not only because I got blocked, but because Wikipedia didn't do anything to me, yet I completely trashed them.

While we welcome editors who genuinely have a change of heart, I'm sure that you will understand that it can be hard to believe it without evidence! Here is what I propose you do to help us see what kind of editing you would do:

Find an article where you feel that you could give a suggestion for improvement. Tell us the article, and the improvement you would make
Think of an article you would like to create. Do your draft on this page and show us how you would create it - it doesn't need to be a complete article, just a couple of paragraphs with suitable references

Once we see that, we can judge more accurately whether it would be wise to unblock you. Regards, PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 04:09, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Hidan(naruto)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Hidan(naruto) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 30#Hidan(naruto) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 00:26, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]