User talk:Gongshow/Archive 3
The Signpost: 28 November 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Arb's resignation sparks lightning RfC, Fundraiser 2011 off to a strong start, GLAM in Qatar
- In the news: The closed, unfriendly world of Wikipedia, fundraiser fun and games, and chemists vs pornstars
- Recent research: Quantifying quality collaboration patterns, systemic bias, POV pushing, the impact of news events, and editors' reputation
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Bugle
- Featured content: The best of the week
The Signpost: 05 December 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Amsterdam gets the GLAM treatment, fundraising marches on, and a flourish of new admins
- In the news: A Wikistream of real time edits, a call for COI reform, and cracks in the ivory tower of knowledge
- Discussion report: Trial proposed for tool apprenticeship
- WikiProject report: This article is about WikiProject Disambiguation. For other uses...
- Featured content: This week's Signpost is for the birds!
The Signpost: 12 December 2011
[edit]- Opinion essay: Wikipedia in Academe – and vice versa
- News and notes: Research project banner ads run afoul of community
- In the news: Bell Pottinger investigation, Gardner on gender gap, and another plagiarist caught red-handed
- WikiProject report: Spanning Nine Time Zones with WikiProject Russia
- Featured content: Wehwalt gives his fifty cents; spies, ambushes, sieges, and Entombment
The Signpost: 19 December 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Anti-piracy act has Wikimedians on the defensive, WMF annual report released, and Indic language dynamics
- In the news: To save the wiki: strike first, then makeover?
- Discussion report: Polls, templates, and other December discussions
- WikiProject report: A dalliance with the dismal scientists of WikiProject Economics
- Featured content: Panoramas with Farwestern and a good week for featured content
- Arbitration report: The community elects eight arbitrators
The Signpost: 26 December 2011
[edit]- Recent research: Psychiatrists: Wikipedia better than Britannica; spell-checking Wikipedia; Wikipedians smart but fun; structured biological data
- News and notes: Fundraiser passes 2010 watermark, brief news
- WikiProject report: The Tree of Life
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, one set for acceptance, arbitrators formally appointed by Jimmy Wales
- Technology report: Wikimedia in Go Daddy boycott, and why you should 'Join the Swarm'
The Signpost: 02 January 2012
[edit]
- Interview: The Gardner interview
- News and notes: Things bubbling along as Wikimedians enjoy their holidays
- WikiProject report: Where are they now? Part III
- Featured content: Ghosts of featured content past, present, and future
- Arbitration report: New case accepted, four open cases, terms begin for new arbitrators
The Signpost: 09 January 2012
[edit]- Technological roadmap: 2011's technological achievements in review, and what 2012 may hold
- News and notes: Fundraiser 2011 ends with a bang
- WikiProject report: From Traditional to Experimental: WikiProject Jazz
- Featured content: Contentious FAC debate: a week in review
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Betacommand 3
The Signpost: 16 January 2012
[edit]
- Special report: English Wikipedia to go dark on January 18
- Sister projects: What are our sisters up to now?
- News and notes: WMF on the looming SOPA blackout, Wikipedia turns 11, and Commons passes 12 million files
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Beer
- Featured content: Lecen on systemic bias in featured content
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, Betacommand case deadlocked, Muhammad images close near
The Signpost: 23 January 2012
[edit]- News and notes: SOPA blackout, Orange partnership
- WikiProject report: The Golden Horseshoe: WikiProject Toronto
- Featured content: Interview with Muhammad Mahdi Karim and the best of the week
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Muhammad images, AUSC call for applications
- Technology report: Looking ahead to MediaWiki 1.19 and related issues
The Signpost: 30 January 2012
[edit]- In the news: Zambian wiki-assassins, Foundation über alles, editor engagement and the innovation plateau
- Recent research: Language analyses examine power structure and political slant; Wikipedia compared to commercial databases
- WikiProject report: Digging Up WikiProject Palaeontology
- Featured content: Featured content soaring this week
- Arbitration report: Five open cases, voting on proposed decisions in two cases
- Technology report: Why "Lua" is on everybody's lips, and when to expect MediaWiki 1.19
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Original Barnstar | |
For expanding You Better Run. Great job. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:24, 31 January 2012 (UTC) |
WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
[edit]
|
The Signpost: 06 February 2012
[edit]- News and notes: The Foundation visits Tunisia, analyzes donors
- In the news: Leading scholar hails Wikipedia, historians urged to contribute while PR pros remain shunned
- Discussion report: Discussion swarms around Templates for deletion and returning editors of colourful pasts
- WikiProject report: The Eye of the Storm: WikiProject Tropical Cyclones
- Featured content: Talking architecture with MrPanyGoff
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, final decision in Muhammad images, Betacommand 3 near closure
You're welcome Gongshow
[edit]I figured the redirects were worth a mention as they often get overlooked and stagnate in bulk AfD cases. Great user-name you have BTW, very well suited to the majority of fine work I see you doing. Have yourself a great day Gongshow, and happy editing! :) -- WikHead (talk) 00:11, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
- And thank you for the kind words Gongshow. I often wish there was a dedicated tool for finding {{db-redirnone}}, as I have a feeling there are thousands out there waiting to be discovered. Stay well, and keep up the good work! :) -- WikHead (talk) 04:51, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 February 2012
[edit]- Special report: Fundraising proposals spark a furore among the chapters
- News and notes: Foundation launches Legal and Community Advocacy department
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Stub Sorting
- Featured content: The best of the week
The Signpost: 20 February 2012
[edit]- Special report: The plight of the new page patrollers
- News and notes: Fundraiser row continues, new director of engineering
- Discussion report: Discussion on copyrighted files from non-US relation states
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Poland
- Featured content: The best of the week
The Signpost: 27 February 2012
[edit]- News and notes: Finance meeting fallout, Gardner recommendations forthcoming
- Recent research: Gender gap and conflict aversion; collaboration on breaking news; effects of leadership on participation; legacy of Public Policy Initiative
- Discussion report: Focus on admin conduct and editor retention
- WikiProject report: Just don't call it "sci-fi": WikiProject Science Fiction
- Arbitration report: Final decision in TimidGuy ban appeal, one case remains open
- Technology report: 1.19 deployment stress, Meta debates whether to enforce SUL
The Signpost: 05 March 2012
[edit]- News and notes: Chapter-selected Board seats, an invite to the Teahouse, patrol becomes triage, and this week in history
- In the news: Heights reached in search rankings, privacy and mental health info; clouds remain over content policing
- Discussion report: COI and NOTCENSORED: policies under discussion
- WikiProject report: We don't bite: WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles
- Featured content: Best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC appointments announced, one case remains open
The Signpost: 12 March 2012
[edit]- Interview: Liaising with the Education Program
- Women and Wikipedia: Women's history, what we're missing, and why it matters
- Arbitration analysis: A look at new arbitrators
- Discussion report: Nothing changes as long discussions continue
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Women's History
- Featured content: Extinct humans, birds, and Birdman
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision in 'Article titles', only one open case
- Education report: Diverse approaches to Wikipedia in Education
The Signpost: 19 March 2012
[edit]- News and notes: Chapters Council proposals take form as research applications invited for Wikipedia Academy and HighBeam accounts
- Discussion report: Article Rescue Squadron in need of rescue yet again
- WikiProject report: Lessons from another Wikipedia: Czech WikiProject Protected Areas
- Featured content: Featured content on the upswing!
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence 'review' opened, Article titles at voting
The Signpost: 26 March 2012
[edit]- News and notes: Controversial content saga continues, while the Foundation tries to engage editors with merchandising and restructuring
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Rock Music
- Featured content: Malfunctioning sharks, toothcombs and a famous mother: featured content for the week
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review at evidence, article titles closed
- Recent research: Predicting admin elections; studying flagged revision debates; classifying editor interactions; and collecting the Wikipedia literature
- Education report: Universities unite for GLAM; and High Schools get their due.
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks so much for rescuing Corazón Partío from being deleted a few years ago. You rule! Keep up the good work. Basilisk4u (talk) 20:05, 29 March 2012 (UTC) |
DYK nomination of Ghost Story (TV series)
[edit]Hello! Your submission of Ghost Story (TV series) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Dl2000 (talk) 18:52, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 April 2012
[edit]- Interview: An introduction to movement roles
- Arbitration analysis: Case review: TimidGuy ban appeal
- News and notes: Berlin reforms to movement structures, Wikidata launches with fanfare, and Wikipedia's day of mischief
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
- Featured content: Snakes, misnamed chapels, and emptiness: featured content this week
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review in third week, one open case
DYK for Julia Holter
[edit]On 3 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Julia Holter, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Julia Holter's debut album Tragedy (2011) was inspired by Euripides' Ancient Greek play Hippolytus? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Julia Holter.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Ghost Story (TV series)
[edit]On 7 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ghost Story (TV series), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Ghost Story, a 1972–73 television anthology series, was renamed Circle of Fear after 13 episodes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ghost Story (TV series).You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:02, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 13:00, 7 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Because by the Dave Clark Five
[edit]Gongshow.......are you aware of the legal settlement that Ron Ryan (writer of the song Because by the DC5) and Dave Clark (of the DC5) entered into? Mr. Ryan accepted a settlement from Mr. Clark (or his business entity) that allowed Mr. Clark to forever be known as the writer of the song Because (as I understand it). I have made such changes to your original article and I have also invited Mr. Ryan to comment regarding this. Mr. Ryan has historically chosen to not speak of the settlement, as it precludes him from making the charges that he (Mr. Ryan) is the original author of the song Because. Had Mr. Ryan never entered into legal settlement with Mr. Clark, he could continue to make the claim, however, it is public information that Mr. Ryan did accept funds from Mr. Clark and did enter into a settlement at that time. For the Wikipedia article, Ron Ryan's name cannot be used, as Mr. Ryan forfeited that right through legal and proper channels.
Just wondered if you were aware of this fact? Hopefully I can get Mr. Ryan to respond to the specifics of the settlement for the historical accuracy of the Wiki article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beaconmike (talk • contribs) 22:59, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Beaconmike, thanks for writing. When creating the "Because" article back in June 2011, I had looked online for general information on the song (e.g., chart performance, critical commentary/reviews), and it was at that time when I learned of the settlement involving Mr. Ryan and Mr. Clark. I came across a couple mentions of the settlement in message boards, but as message boards didn't - and still don't - meet Wikipedia's reliable sources criteria, I ignored them and focused on the books, magazines, newspapers, and reputable websites I had found that contained coverage of the song. None of these sources mentioned Mr. Ryan, and indeed (see the original June 7, 2011 version of the Wikipedia article), I credited Mr. Clark as the songwriter because that's who the reliable sources had credited. In viewing the article's edit history, the addition of Mr. Ryan's name was added the following day by a different editor. I haven't regularly monitored the article, and now that I see the current version, my preference moving forward would be to remove all mentions of Mr. Ryan and restore the original June 7, 2011 version. Please let me know if that solution would be helpful, or if I may be helpful in some other way. Thanks again for taking time to bring this to my attention. Gongshow Talk 01:07, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
You are on the correct and legal track here. I do my very best to trust Wiki for its accuracy and dependency for the truth. I have invited Mr. Ryan to present his side of the equation. He refuses to comment on the settlement between he and Mr. Clark (which I do believe happened and is true and verifiable). Mr. Ryan has preferred to state that he was the original writer of the song (which I believe to be true), rather than admit that he gave away his legal rights to be able to claim that he was the original songwriter, in the settlement with Mr. Clark.
The debate over this has gone on and on for many a year on the DC5 message boards that pop up around the web. Until Mr. Ryan decides to acknowledge the terms of his settlement with Mr. Clark, and until that can be verified, the legal right for Mr. Ryan must be recused from the pages of Wiki, as Mr. Ryan's claims are not legally correct. Mr. Clark is the legal owner of the song "Because" and as such, should not be entitled to be challenged by anyone elses claims (without proof).
I encourage you to edit the page to reflect that Mr. Clark is the legal owner of the song, and until such proof is presented by Mr. Ryan on the talkpage regarding the settlement with Mr. Clark, that Mr. Ryan's claims are just that...............claims with no verifiable proof and probably in violation of his settlement with Mr. Clark. I strongly suspect that Mr. Ryan was awarded funds by Mr. Clark's business entity during the settlement, that amongst other conditions, precluded Mr. Ryan from ever again making the claim that the song "Because" was written by Mr. Ryan.
Thanks for the great article by the way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beaconmike (talk • contribs) 03:57, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the nice words - I have gone ahead and made the changes. Feel free to remove or add any further information you wish to the article. Gongshow Talk 06:04, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
NBC logos
[edit]If you think those sources work, feel free to add them. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:36, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Cameron Finley
[edit]I still have my doubts. Literally all the sources are from when he played Beaver — and even then they do little more than name him — and I don't think a voice acting role on a 13 episode cartoon holds much weight toward WP:ENT. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:10, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Why can't other editors be as rational as you? You say "keep, sources exist", I ask you to prove it, and you do. Then you provide your proof again in the Cameron Finley AFD. So many editors fail the WP:PROVEIT thing, but I applaud you for actually showing your work. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:53, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi Fashion
[edit]Hi! :) Saw your proposed deletion on Hi Fashion and I've added some sources. This is my first article, maybe you can help me. Can you check the sources I've found and see what you think? Or point me in the right directions? Cheers! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Typhoneus (talk • contribs) 03:11, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
- Aw, thank you so much for your kind words! Very encouraging to a first timer, haha! You're right, the coding is a little intimidating but I managed it I think. I read the reliable source page you linked, that does cover the issue for sure. I think the links I found are alright-ish for notability; and the one you found really helps too! Thanks again for your help, if there's some sort of award for awesome folk on Wikipedia, you should get it! -- Typhoneus (talk) 15:46, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
inre Cameron Finley
[edit]Your de-prodding was decently done and your comments at the resulting AFD were quite cogent. While it would be nice that the fellow have wide coverage for his entire body of work, it is enough that even sources which tend to concentrate on one film, offer information about others that can be used to cite the article. In addressing the mis-impression by some that his child actor notability is dismissable simply because he left the business, I kept WP:NTEMP in mind when I began expanding and sourcing[1] the article in question. That some of the available sources might be behind paywalls is not a criteria for deletion. I invite you to assist in further expansion and sourcing. Thanks, Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 22:45, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Thief of Thieves
[edit]On 10 May 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Thief of Thieves, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Robert Kirkman's method for co-writing the Thief of Thieves comic book series was influenced by his work on The Walking Dead TV show? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Thief of Thieves.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:06, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
How to create rivalry page?
[edit]Do you know how to create a rivalry page like the Michigan-ohio one?
Basically, I don't know where to start haha. I'm trying to make one for the new Michigan-Nebraska rivalry. It's a new rivalry for both teams in terms of meetings on the field, but the two programs know each other very well for bad reasons (1997 dispute, 2005 alamo bowl ending controversy).
MGoBlueHockey (talk) 17:38, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi, can you check out some recent edits to the above - I'm not sure if they are vandalism or not. Regards Denisarona (talk) 09:10, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
Congratulations
[edit]The Super Disambiguator's Barnstar | ||
The Super Disambiguator's Barnstar is awarded to the winners of the Disambiguation pages with links monthly challenge, who have gone above and beyond to remove ambiguous links. Your achievment will be recorded at the Hall of Fame. This award is presented to Gongshow, for successfully fixing 5570 links in the challenge of May, 2012. Sorry for the belated barnstar; nobody seems to have got round to it yet! Rcsprinter (shout) 11:45, 10 June 2012 (UTC) |
Pete Francis Heimbold
[edit]Nice WP:HEY work on Pete Francis Heimbold. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:52, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Wineville Chicken Coop Murders
[edit]I'm not too sure how this stuff works at all, but let me ask you a question. I think I am writing to someone named gongshow. If not, and this message is going to someone else...........sorry.
Gongshow; are you the person who wrote that I do not own the wineville chicken coop murders and that my postings have ruined the page?
Before I get into it with you, I want to make sure that you are in fact the person whom has accused me of such on that page. Someone has left me messages accusing me of stuff, and if they wish to speak to me in an unemotional matter like an adult, with a mature discussion of my involvement and knowledge, then I am more than willing to back up anything you wish to ask me about.
If that is not you, please disregard this message. IF this is you, would you please quit screaming at me and just ask me your questions. There is absoulutely nothing that I have posted that is not able to be backed up with historical facts. In fact, I spend a great deal of time on this page, trying to make quite certain that those who post regarding the history of Wineville versus the film Changeling do not get the 2 mistaken.
I have the backing of the Riverside Historical society on my side, the 2 authors whom have penned the only 2 books about Wineville and I have completely discredited the screenwriter of the film Changeling with his historical lies and inaccuracies.
So what are your questions and let's speak maturely, if you have questions ,just ask them, but you had better be very careful of that which you are accusing me of...............if that is you whom is doing it.
Beaconmike (talk) 04:34, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
- Hello, yes I am Gongshow, but I'm afraid you have the wrong editor. My only messages to you, both dated 10 April 2012, were in reference to a discussion we had at the time about the song "Because" by the Dave Clark Five. You may recall it involved the songwriter. I placed blue boxes on your talkpage on that date to notify you that I had responded to the messages you left on my talkpage. Here is a link to the now-archived discussion.
- The recent edits you appear to be asking about were written by an IP editor, specifically User 98.87.53.27. Using that link, you can message the editor by clicking the "Talk" link located below the "User contributions" header. I hope this helps. Cheers, Gongshow Talk 05:12, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
The Article Rescue Barnstar | ||
Thanks for finding and adding sources to the Too Good to Be True (1936 song) article. Your efforts to improve the encyclopedia for the public are appreciated. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:19, 16 July 2012 (UTC) |
- Hear, hear. I'm impressed by the quality of the sources you found. I created an article for the composer, Clay Boland, and so had a good rummage through the sources but didn't notice sources such as The Jazz Bass Book - Technique and Tradition. How did you find these, please? Are they in your personal library or do you have access to a good online search tool? Warden (talk) 12:35, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
- As the one who first created the article, I'm grateful that you found enough material to satisfy TPH enough to withdraw his deletion proposal. It is very frustrating to see challenges of articles I created years ago and have long ago stopped thinking about, so I have to try to dredge up more material. This whole business of prod-ing articles that were good enough in the past is one reason I hardly ever edit Wikipedia any more, and have gone to Wikia. So it's people like you who are willing to tough it out and track down obscure stuff like this that I have to thank immensely. -- BRG (talk) 03:25, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
DYK for The Mojo Men
[edit]On 20 July 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Mojo Men, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that The Mojo Men's 1966 single "She's My Baby" was sampled on Kanye West's "Hell of a Life", a song from his 2010 album My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Mojo Men. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Yngvadottir (talk) 00:03, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
New Britain Dry Cleaning Corp.
[edit]Thank you for reviewing the article.
I will be adding a "nutshell" at the beginning of the article and reference numbers throughout the article. BTW, is the nutshell something new? I ask that because several other people have reviewed the article and did not mention that.
I added the extra words before Elks Club and Lions club as you suggested.
Your suggested change to "cash and carry (wholesale)" was not correct so I deleted that change. Cash and carry refers to walk-in retail customers.
Your suggested change to add "performance-related pay" before "bonuses" was not correct so I deleted the change. The bonuses that were paid were from excess profits that were distributed to all employees based on years of service.
Grandson-Jim (talk) 14:11, 26 July 2012 (UTC)Grandson-Jim
- Hi, thanks for writing. I believe your points are meant for another editor, as my only contribution to the article was to clarify the use of cold storage (see link for the edit I made back in May). Generally, if you find that an editor's suggestion is incorrect, Wikipedia encourages all of us to be bold, and your deletions sound reasonable given your reasoning. Please note that "Cash and carry" by itself does not link to an article, but to a list of articles which are related to the term in some way. If none of these possibilities apply, it might be best to simply remove the link.
- As for nutshells at the beginning of articles, having a section (whether it's a sentence or paragraph) which serves as an introduction/summary to the article is standard practice, and is particularly useful in articles of this length. For example, here are a few articles about other Connecticut-based companies: Pratt-Read, TicketNetwork, American Brass Company. I hope this helps. Cheers, Gongshow Talk 22:33, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
New Britain Dry Cleaning Corp.
[edit]Ms./Ms. Gongshow:
I'm pretty new to this Wikipedia article-writing stuff and it gets pretty confusing trying to create an article that satisfies everyone.
Regarding the lead-in paragraph: Is there coding that I need to add to start and stop the Introduction? Somewhere I found "===Introduction===" that I think may start the lead. Do I need some other coding to stop the lead section or does "===History===" stop the lead?
Regarding the Issues that need to be resolved: One says that "This article is orphan as no other articles link to it." Can I, or some reviewer (you?) remove this comment since this is not an editing issue and can only be resolved if somebody else eventually links to this article -- which may not happen for some time, if at all. Why have this as an open issue? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grandson-Jim (talk • contribs) 18:54, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is ready
[edit]Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Check your Wikipedia email:
- The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
- To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
- If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
- A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
- HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
- Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
- When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 00:46, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Future - Pluto.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Future - Pluto.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:27, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
The Paseo (Kansas City)
[edit]Good job with WP:HEY. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 09:57, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Future - Pluto.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Future - Pluto.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:19, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Barenaked Ladies demo tapes
[edit]Thank you for actually adding sources. Far too many people say "keep, there are sources" but never prove that there are. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:54, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Royal Ascot template
[edit]Thank you for doing the dabs on the Royal Ascot template - I'd meant to fix them this evening but found you had fixed them - thanks again. --Bcp67 (talk) 20:16, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Bubbling Under
[edit]So have we reached a consensus here or not? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:11, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Razia
[edit]Thank you for being so helpful with the Razia article. Your the only editor who has really explained to me what I have been doing wrong and now I feel like I understand how to properly set the Notes vs References sections etc.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johncumbancha (talk • contribs) 14:52, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Adminship?
[edit]Hello there Gongshow. I've seen your edits at AfD, and you seemed like the sort of person who has clue. So I took a little look at your other contributions and I was impressed. How would you feel about running for adminship? I think you are more than ready for it. Best regards — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 14:10, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
Page Curation newsletter
[edit]Hey Gongshow. I'm dropping you a note because you used to (or still do!) patrol new pages. This is just to let you know that we've deployed and developed Page Curation, which augments and supersedes Special:NewPages - there are a lot of interesting new features :). There's some help documentation here if you want to familiarise yourself with the system and start using it. If you find any bugs or have requests for new features, let us know here. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 12:35, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 30
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Love My Way (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New wave (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:55, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
Allele template
[edit]{{Allele}} can be safely speedied via WP:CSD#G8, since it's a page dependent on a nonexistant page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 12:35, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
- Ah, I see how it fits the criteria there. Thanks for the heads up! Gongshow Talk 17:59, 5 December 2012 (UTC)