User talk:Gonbal2

Welcome!

Hello, Gonbal2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV), and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Asterion^talk 00:15, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Andalusia, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you.--Strothra (talk) 18:15, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. . Asterion^talk 16:54, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish people - 3RR warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Spanish people. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Gonbal2 you just revert to a vandal's version and you do not even talk about it or explain in a edit summary! This can not be The Ogre (talk) 19:56, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You have been reported. The Ogre (talk) 20:02, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peru

Hello. I've just reverted your recent edits to Peru because, according to Wikipedia guidelines, articles have to be verifiable. The figures currently provided in the Peru article are properly referenced to reliable sources (in this particular case to publications by the Peruvian Central Bank and the Peruvian National Institute of Statistics). Those figures should not be changed unless a more recent estimate is available and a new reliable reference is provided. Until that time it is better for the article to stick to its sources. Greetings, --Victor12 (talk) 23:20, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish people

It is not "vandalism" In the case of the text of "Spanish people" I present four references of certain value to vary a current definition that doesn't present references. is this vandalism? You should investigate the sources well, don't mention opinions without references. I wait you don't erase my collaboration properly sustained in reliable sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gonbal2 (talk • contribs) 18:16, 21 October, 2008 (UTC)

You weren't specifically blocked for vandalism but rather edit warring. Your edits have been challenged by more than one editor, so you should be discussing them on the talk page rather than continuing them without discussion. You are also not giving any edit summaries about why you're making the change, so you need to start adding summaries when you edit. You should also log in with your account, or it may look like you're trying to avoid the 3 revert rule. Kman543210 (talk) 00:55, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Spanish people, you will be blocked from editing. Kman543210 (talk) 15:42, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing as you did to Spanish people. You have already been previously warned and blocked for these edits. Since several editors have reverted them, you should discuss the changes on the talk page before trying to reinstate them. Kman543210 (talk) 13:21, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Peru, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 04:56, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Krasny Bor

Hello, What You say that General Esteban Infantes not directed the battle, is false. Lindemann and Esteban Infantes, both theoretically led the Battle, but in practice only the Spanish participated and died in battle, so, Hitler decorated Esteban Infantes. The French and Spanish versions as well as certified. For minimum respect for the dead Spanish volunteers, not try to change history. 200.121.237.228 (talk) 23:18, 4 April 2012 (UTC)Gonbal2[reply]

In practice, (according to, for example Glantz in "Battle of Leningrad") the bulk of the Soviet attack fell on both the Spanish and the SS Police division. So it was not just Spanish, and Infantes was never in command of the SS Police division. Over the next two days, the Germans reinforced the positions with regimental groups from 7 divisions. Notably the regimental groups from the 212th and 215th Infantry divisions helped to hold the line. The battle group Flemish Legion was reduced to 50 men by the end of March 1943 and the whole unit was sent to be reformed. The continued attempts to present a typical 1942-1943 eastern front engagement as a "300 spartans" battle is what's disrespecting the dead.

The content of the French and Spanish versions is irrelevant. Especially since the Spanish version very poorly sourced, and the French version is a translated hybrid of the English and French versions.D2306 (talk) 07:58, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That what you say is opposed to all historical study. It is clear that what you say is opposed to all historical study French, German, British and Americans (irrelevant you say¡¡¡). Paradoxical that only your version oppose each other. Thousands of dead Spanish and decoration by the Nazis who were their leaders and survivors, according to your version, did not exist. A lack of respect for dead Spanish soldiers, totally untenable and deplorable. So was the story and not what you want to understand.Gonbal2 (talk) 05:49, 19 April 2012 (UTC)Gonbal2[reply]

Paradoxal, that you did not notice I gave a specific reference to a very well known American historian, David Glantz. I can get more if need. So it is not "my" version. I you read carefully, nowhere does it say that "thousands of dead Spanish and decoration by the Nazis did not exist". It merely states that they were by far not alone, and therefore putting Infantes as commander (which is what the discussion was about) is incorrect. And nothing that was written has any "lack of respect for dead Spanish soldiers". And you did not give any references whatsoever to support you dubious claims.

If you still believe you are right, you can copy this to the article talk page and we can get WP:MILHIST to reach a consensus.D2306 (talk) 08:28, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your article Sesquicentenario

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Sesquicentenario to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It currently has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. --Animalparty-- (talk) 05:59, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]