User talk:Gomfbears

Welcome!

Hello, Gomfbears, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

I want to personally welcome you to wikipedia, and I'm sorry I got off to a bad start. The reason I nominated The Bench for deletion was because I felt that there was not enough treatment of this group in WP:RS to warrant treatment in an encyclopedia article, which is required by our verifiability policy. Perhaps your new additions show that the group is indeed notable, as the concept is called, and in that case it will be kept. In any case, I encourage you to continue contributing to Wikipedia! nadav 09:08, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou, i look forward to a promising and fun Wiki experience.

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:BigC VT.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:IMG 0560.JPG. The copy called Image:IMG 0560.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 06:47, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Big C

Hi there. I noticed that, when you put together your article on Cal's Big C, you uploaded an image that overwrote the image file for UCR's Big C. I have reverted the image because it is linked directly into UCR's main article, and having Cal scenery in the UCR article just doesn't look professional. Please upload the picture of Cal's Big C again, but name it something other than Image:BigC.jpg (Image:CalBigC.jpg would work). Thanks. --Dynaflow 14:42, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Prank.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Prank.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:56, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Bench.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Bench.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:50, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Club at Berkeley

Hi Gomfbears, I'm just writing to let you know that me and some Wikipedian friends are launching Wikipedia Club at Berkeley, a student club for promoting participation in Wikipedia and face-to-face collaborations. If that sounds fun to you, please consider joining our mailing list. I'm sure we can help you in your contributions. Thanks! Dcoetzee 01:29, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of California Indian Song for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article California Indian Song is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/California Indian Song until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. PG Pirate 23:33, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sons of California for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sons of California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sons of California until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. PG Pirate 23:42, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Stanford Jonah for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Stanford Jonah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Stanford Jonah until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. PG Pirate 23:43, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Bench (University of California) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Bench (University of California) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bench (University of California) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 11:06, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]