User talk:Gomero12345

May 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:50, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gomero12345 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The user DBSSHASPER, have been editing Football records in Spain with information that should not be included in the records section. Besides that he does no include citation to the records. I'm just following the rules and challenging no sourced material. He have been reporting me for block because I delete his no sourced material. He have been deleting material that I post with reliable sources. Why not block him. You should analyze this user because he is not making good contributions to the encyclopedia as I'm doing. Review his edits and you would see what I'm talking about.

Decline reason:

~~For obvious socking, I've blocked your other accounts and extended your block to 1 week. Not only that, I've hardblocked your IP for also 1 week. Elockid ^(Talk) 03:23, 26 May 2012 (UTC)~~[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thank you.

Gomero12345 (talk) 22:08, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Original block reinstated. Elockid ^(Talk) 04:36, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just for reference - THIS set of edits, removed 2 references, added 1 reference by the actual football club and tried to fool us with two references using Wikipedia pages - we do not use Wikipedia pages a reliable sources. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 18:20, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]