User talk:Gomati Sharma

Rachnadevi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rachnadevi, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the Submit the draft for review! button atop the article. Silikonz💬 13:55, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I'll try to make it long but don't add it to draftsman I don't like it Gomati Sharma (talk) 13:58, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rachnadevi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rachnadevi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Silikonz💬 14:08, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rachnadevi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rachnadevi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachnadevi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Silikonz💬 14:18, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay after your discussion is done please note if you want to remove this article or not Gomati Sharma (talk) 14:20, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Devamala (Shunga dynasty) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Devamala (Shunga dynasty), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:53, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Rachnadevi, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. TheFrog001 - Talk to me! 16:16, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sir I'll promise you that I'll never make many more pages but can you please accept my two pages please delete if I make extra pages but don't delete this Teo pages I plead you Gomati Sharma (talk) 16:19, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have failed to follow through on this promise. You didn't stop at the second article. You have now created 4 unverifiable articles in mainspace. This is unacceptable. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:33, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ghatotkacha (king), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:33, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Gupta (king), you may be blocked from editing. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:55, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did with this edit to Devamala (Shunga dynasty). TheFrog001 - Talk to me! 17:14, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Babruvahana. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:46, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Kimveka (Mahabharata). You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:51, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Kimveka (Mahabharata). Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:15, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Pulakeshin I. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:14, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Devamala (Shunga dynasty) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Devamala (Shunga dynasty) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devamala (Shunga dynasty) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:26, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bhanumati (Kushana Empress) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bhanumati (Kushana Empress) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhanumati (Kushana Empress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:01, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kimveka (Mahabharata) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kimveka (Mahabharata) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimveka (Mahabharata) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:57, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

As mentioned by several others above, please have a look at WP:V and WP:RS - you cannot just add any content to Wikipedia: it needs to be sourced. Have a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources. If you continue to add unsourced content, you will end up getting blocked. utcursch | talk 12:54, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I had previously declined a report at WP:AIV with an explanation that boils down to "warned", returned to Gomati Sharma's contribution list a few hours later and saw yet another two unsourced content additions, so I have blocked for now. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:04, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Verifiability is a core Wikipedia policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:52, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Regarding this edit, you cannot just add any source to an article. The source should support the content that you are adding to the article. Please have a look at WP:V. If you haven't already gone through WP:TUTORIAL, please do so before making any further edits. utcursch | talk 17:18, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry sir I was in hurry Gomati Sharma (talk) 18:49, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Chandraditya (Chalukya dynasty). utcursch | talk 06:59, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't do anything Gomati Sharma (talk) 07:03, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Dhruva Dharavarsha. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:36, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Pradyota dynasty. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:04, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pushpavati for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pushpavati is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pushpavati until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:18, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tarinidevi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tarinidevi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tarinidevi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:34, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shubhapradha (Rashtrakuta Queen) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shubhapradha (Rashtrakuta Queen) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shubhapradha (Rashtrakuta Queen) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:42, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jayalakshmidevi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jayalakshmidevi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jayalakshmidevi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:46, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:43, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anjalimati moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Anjalimati, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:35, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Anjalimati has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Anjalimati. Thanks! Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I have blocked you because, despite multiple warnings and even a block for it, you continue to make contentious edits without providing sources for your edits. You are aware of these warnings. You are aware of our policies around sourcing and references. However you seem to choose not to abide by them. Why? Is it that you don't think they apply to you? Is it because you deliberately choose to ignore them? Or is it just lack of competence to edit this encyclopaedia? Whatever the reason all we see is that you will not abide by the rules for sourcing and ignore people who inform you of them and are even deliberately dismissive of it. So you've been blocked from editing for it. If you wish to make an unblock request you can do so by following the instructions below, but you will really need to convince the reviewing administrator that you will change (I'm not convinced.) Canterbury Tail talk 15:04, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Canterbury Tail talk 15:04, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]