User talk:GolfAuthority

This is an alternative account of Bluedogtn.

Welcome, Please, comment to the authority on golf! GOLFAUTHORITY 00:18, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:2010PGALogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:2010PGALogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:16, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article ownership

Future talk of article ownership can begin below this line. - Dudesleeper / Talk 11:39, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just an inkling I have, based on experience. I'll apologise if it turns out I'm off the mark. - Dudesleeper / Talk 23:30, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:New Open Championship ‎

Why? _wjemather ^bigissue 22:29, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so you will tag with {{db-author}} then? For future reference, it would be best to use a sandbox or user subpage to test stuff, rather than creating a live template. Then once you think it looks ready, you can ask others for opinions before going live (to avoid the scenario we had with the WGC, Players and Tour championships navboxes). If you think there is a problem with an existing template that cannot be easily solved immediately, then it is best to raise it at the template talk page or the related project talk page (WP:GOLF in this case). Cheers. _wjemather ^bigissue 22:42, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sherwood, Bighorn, Bridges etc.

As you can tell, I have moved the article to Monday Night Golf as this is a broader and more generic title, and created redirects for Showdown at Sherwood, Battle at Bighorn and Battle at the Bridges. I have also improved the intro and the first two match sections a bit. There is still plenty of work to do on it though, such as including & comparing tv ratings, which was the main purpose of the matches. _wjemather ^bigissue 16:49, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Irish Golf Courses

Do you want to {{db-author}} tag this or do I need to list it at TfD? Regards. _wjemather ^bigissue 00:33, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Never Comming Back!

By wikipedia!_BLuE ^DOg^Tn 22:31, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]