User talk:Goldstriker

Welcome!

Hi Goldstriker! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 21:46, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Farnborough Air Show 1 - Request Permission Rich Cooper Photography.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Farnborough Air Show 1 - Request Permission Rich Cooper Photography.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 21:46, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Goldstriker! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, information on its copyright and licensing status, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft

I did some more copyediting clean-up on your Sandbox draft, but beyond that, know nothing about the topic. The section "Gravity Industries in the press" needs to have its contents turned into references, as hyperlinks in the text are not allowed. That is the stuff that may be enough to establish notability. The TED Talk and book should not be references. Maybe more to External links. Good luck with a submittal. David notMD (talk) 11:05, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Goldstriker (talk) 21:23, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

to submit your draft

Inside double curly brackets {{ }} placed at the top of your Sandbox, but subst:Submit. This will submit your draft to Articles for Creation for review. There is a backlog of more than 5,000 drafts. It's not a queue, so can be days, weeks, or sadly, months for a reviewer to act on it. You can continue to work on the draft while waiting. David notMD (talk) 00:40, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Possible conflict of interest or paid

What, if any, is your connection to Richard Browning and Gravity Industries? Paid? Personal? WP:PAID or WP:COI may apply. Also, are you stating that you took the three photos, one in 2018 and two in 2021? David notMD (talk) 00:48, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it's voluntary work (will this fit into personal?), it wasn't me who took the pictures,an email has been sent to wikipedia for permission and rights have been given by photographer. What do I need to change? Goldstriker (talk) 12:23, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If not payment or other form of financial support, or expected as part of your job, then not PAID. Question then is do you have a personal connection to Browning or Gravity? If yes, that should be explained on your Talk page as COI. David notMD (talk) 20:46, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will have a deeper look into these acronyms. Thanks Goldstriker (talk) 21:22, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and thanks for the help, what should I do to change the state of the pictures? What is the right way to have them comply Goldstriker (talk) 07:22, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again is there a formal way of putting this on then talk page, any specific order? Goldstriker (talk) 07:34, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Acknowledging source of content

A lot of this content appears to have been sourced from Richard Browning (inventor). On the Talk page of your Sandbox draft, it is mandatory that you acknowledge that content was copied and where it was copied from. Wikipedia allows copying within Wikipedia, but only with acknowledgement. Otherwise, it is considered plagiarism, and grounds for deletion. It is possible that a reviewer may decide that there is so much overlap between your draft and the existing article, that the existing article has priority. If that occurs, then anyone searching Wikipedia for Gravity Industries would be redirected to the Browning article. David notMD (talk) 09:15, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the text was given to me to put it that way. What would you recommend? Rewrite everything? Or giving acknowledgment to other page? Duplicate entries won't look good for Wikipedia, you are right. Thank you Goldstriker (talk) 12:26, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Give acknowledgement to the page. See my work for example. At both Shellfish allergy and Fish allergy I acknowledge copying content from Egg allergy.

Thanks for the feedback. Do you mean at the bottom where it says related articles? Goldstriker (talk) 21:20, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No. I mean on the Talk page of the article or draft, state that you copied content and references, and name the article copied from. As for linking the articles to each other, right now, the Lead of your Sandbox draft has a Wikilink to Richard Browning (inventor). If your draft is accepted, then you can add a Wikilink from Richard to Gravity Industries. A problem the reviewer will need to address if this is accepted, is that currently, a search within Wikipedia on Gravity Industries automatically redirects to the Browning article. David notMD (talk) 00:01, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As there a formal way of stating this on the talk page ? Any template or example? Goldstriker (talk) 07:30, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is* Goldstriker (talk) 07:30, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Create a new section, much as I did at Talk:Fish allergy, and then explain. Recycling content from one article to another is allowed without prejudice as long as identified. Another example: for all vitamins, I created a section in Talk titled "Dietary Reference Intakes" and explained that the same format would be used for all articles. David notMD (talk) 10:48, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gravity Industries (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject. Not every business corporation is notable, and this draft does not establish corporate notability. You may ask for advice about corporate notability at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gravity Industries and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gravity Industries, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:41, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Goldstriker! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 22:41, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here to Help for your Article

Hi @ Goldstriker, I am here to help you out for your article: Gravity Industries. There are enough Resources available on the internet for the Company. I would suggest you to collect the other refernces and refrain the content in a neutral point of view. If you have any doubts, contact me in my Talk page. Jocelin Andrea (talk) 05:44, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I have written on your talk page. Goldstriker (talk) 05:48, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gravity Industries

Hello, Goldstriker. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gravity Industries, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]