User talk:Goldstann

Your edits to Franklin D. Roosevelt

Regarding these edits: Thank you for experimenting with the page Franklin D. Roosevelt on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Muchness 18:35, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Elaine Herbert

Please do not make personal attacks on other people as you did at Elaine Herbert. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create such pages will be blocked from editing by administrators or banned by the arbitration committee. Thank you. El Zoof 11:35, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Nellie Connally. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --ArmadilloFromHellGateBridge 09:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Francesca Mold

A tag has been placed on Francesca Mold , requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --ArmadilloFromHellGateBridge 09:43, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently re-created the article Francesca Mold, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. A ecis ^{Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984.} 16:09, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to create inappropriate pages such as Francesca Mold, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ju66l3r 06:12, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. ju66l3r 06:35, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your posts

As requested previously, please sign all your posts see Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages. And also:

It seems to me that you are acting in an uncivil manner. Please remain civil and don't resort to making personal attacks or instigating edit wars. --ArmadilloFromHellGateBridge 17:43, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, as you did at Talk:Opalinida, you will be blocked for disruption. ju66l3r 06:14, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Opalinida, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --ArmadilloFromHellGateBridge 06:33, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your repeated efforts to vandalize articles makes it seem that you are unaware that Wikipedia is a serious project. You have been reported to the administration group for continuing vandalism and an administrator will review your contributions shortly. You may not receive another warning before being blocked, so be careful and be serious from now on. If you are blocked, please reconsider your behavior once the block expires.

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 48 hours because of disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism, including page blanking or addition of random text, spam, or deliberate misinformation; privacy violations; personal attacks; and repeated and blatant violations of WP:NPOV will not be tolerated. --MCB 07:04, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Goldstann (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Okay, its been 48 hours and I'm still blocked. Whats up?

Decline reason:

Take a look at your block log. 48 hours has not passed and you're lucky it's not being extended for block evasion. -- Netsnipe ► 02:04, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Goldstann (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Okay, This isn't really a a request to be unblocked, its just a question and this is the only way I can do it. So: What and where is my block log?

Decline reason:

Heh, no problem. ;) You can also use the {{helpme}} template to ask questions (you'll probably get friendlier people). You can find your block log here, or click "my contributions" at the top of the page, and find the links up at the top, oooor your block log is also linked in the unblock templates on this very page. Any of those should work for you. Luna Santin 03:25, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I hope this helps: you were blocked on December 4 at 7:57am UTC. This means that your block expires on December 6 at 7:57am UTC, which would be at 8:57pm New Zealand time. (I'm assuming from the Francesca Mold article that you are from New Zealand). A ecis ^{Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984.} 23:57, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking this talk page

Keep on doing it and you are likley to get blocked again. --ArmadilloFromHellGateBridge 23:09, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kathy Hilton

Please stop. If you continue to blank or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Kathy Hilton, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --ArmadilloFromHellGateBridge 23:10, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]