User talk:Gold Junior

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Gold Junior. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Simon Davou Mwadkwon, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 17:53, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tacyarg I don't know why there's been a pushback to my editings on Simon Mwadkwon in quick succession even after I have abided by every rules governing Wikipedia edit policies and absolutely haven't stepped out of line on the editorial exercise regarding Simon Mwadkwon.

what I edited is a story that happened, not that it didn't happen or I concocted it. Gold Junior (talk) 21:17, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your reply. Every statement on Wikipedia should be referenced to reliable sources, especially in articles about living people. Also, you uploaded a photograph tagged as your own work - do you know, work for or represent Mwadkwon? Tacyarg (talk) 00:09, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tacyarg I edited 100-percent reliably-sourced materials(including pictures on public domain not copyrighted under any law). I do not work for Mwadkwon. I work to push the frontiers of Global Commons.

so can I return back my edits? Gold Junior (talk) 02:09, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the response. Is the photograph correctly tagged as taken by you? Tacyarg (talk) 08:47, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Gold Junior! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:11, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Significa liberdade

I appreciate that my contributions are well spoken of by you . i want to create a time in my schedule before I scale up contribution Gold Junior (talk) 04:30, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Daser David moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Daser David. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Uspti (talk) 06:33, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Uspti a Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hannah Ryder has been relisted twice and the quality of the sourcing a major focus. if you could help with a review and add a comment which would help . Gold Junior (talk) 21:02, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Development Reimagined

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Development Reimagined, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Gronk Oz (talk) 05:28, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gronk Oz this is not my first article. I am not doing a promotion for the article which was deleted on that grounds . the source or the summary what is promotional about it? Gold Junior (talk) 17:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry that this happened to your article. I can't see the article any more now that it has been deleted, but really it was full of promotional expressions and virtually no neutral statements of fact. If you would like to challenge the deletion, or perhaps request to have the article reinstated as a Draft so you can work on making it more neutral before publishing it again, you should contact the Administrator who deleted it, who is Deb. In the meantime, you might find it helpful to read this short article that outlines what is seen as promotional material at Wikipedia: WP:PROMOTION. I hope this helps. Gronk Oz (talk) 00:06, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Advert warning

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Deb (talk) 08:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Deb noted. never intended to promote or advertise . I will take corrective when writing up the second time. always welcome to learning Gold Junior (talk) 15:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hannah Ryder moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hannah Ryder, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 18:50, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Hello, Gold Junior. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 13:26, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Deb please the Hannah Ryder article was and is not promotional or an explicit advert material, the topic is a subject I barely know personally. it is an article I have researched fairly. highlight the advertisement or publicity in my article?! Gold Junior (talk) 21:26, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Deb I beg to disagree this time with the undoing of this page. the references cited in this article are independent, reliable eg Reuters, Financial Times, China Global Television Network. please this recurring

vetoing of this article needs to be explain to me in step by step detail Gold Junior (talk) 23:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's no vetoing. You just need to write the article in accordance with the guidelines. Your version reads like a CV. Deb (talk) 07:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Deb the page has been reviewed from the mail I received from wikipedia . I am confused seeing this message from you after the wikipedia message Gold Junior (talk) 08:14, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What mail are you talking about? I can't see your e-mails. Deb (talk) 09:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Deb at 2:32 am I received a wikipedia message about the Hannah Ryder page has been reviewed. I suppose this means the Is have been dotted and Ts cross in respect to the page Gold Junior (talk) 10:32, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you talking about an e-mail? The fact that something has been reviewed by one person doesn't mean it won't be deleted when others look at it. Sometimes reviewers are quite new users who aren't yet familiar with all the guidelines. Either way, a version of the article (but not the version you created) is now subject to a deletion discussion. And you still haven't declared your COI on your user page. Deb (talk) 10:49, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Deb ok. I have one question ? what is the current status of the page ? Gold Junior (talk) 11:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just told you. It's been nominated for deletion and is being discussed at the link I gave you above. Deb (talk) 12:25, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Deb I have joined in the discussion with my contributions for the deletion to be reconsidered having seen the neutral positions that has been added in the article . thanks Gold Junior (talk) 12:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

You are repeatedly soliciting paid editing work using your twitter account, most recently about an hour ago. You must realise that this is not acceptable behaviour. If you continue to do so, your account will be blocked as someone who is not here to improve ghe encyclopedia, but merely to enrich himself from it. --Tagishsimon (talk) 14:21, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tagishsimon NOTED. though I don't like the idea of surveillance. Gold Junior (talk) 18:46, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daser David (September 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bobby Cohn were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daser David and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bobby Cohn (talk) 14:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gold Junior! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bobby Cohn (talk) 14:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. In accordance with WP:PAID you must declare your connections to the subject you are writing about. Bobby Cohn (talk) 14:44, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Digital Bridge Institute moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Digital Bridge Institute. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Bobby Cohn (talk) 14:46, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

Drmies (talk) 14:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]