User talk:Gold1618
Welcome!
[edit]
|
Hey man... I saw that you added all of those AZA songs back in February. I recently did a total overhaul of the page, and got rid of them. I think it would be a good idea for you to instead put them in a separate page called "Aleph Zadik Aleph songs" or something similar, and then we can link to it from the main page. I'm just trying to keep the main page as professional, concise and encyclopedic as possible. Drop me a line and we can talk about it!
Note
[edit]First, please ensure that any new entries on a talkpage go at the BOTTOM of the page - I almost did not see your addition. Second, I have replied to your rude comment on my talkpage - further discussion can take place there, but only if you choose to discuss politely. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:31, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:31, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
Chomsky and Zionism/anti-Zionism
[edit]Hi; just to let you know that I have replied on my talk page to your recent comment. RolandR (talk) 18:46, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Invitation to join WikiProject United States
[edit] |
Hello, Gold1618! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!! |
--Kumioko (talk) 16:48, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
That site, which I shall not even mention by name, has been removed constantly from the article. It's not notable even one little tiny bit. Editors keep re-adding it; but it won't stay for very long once they do. Please refrain from adding any mention of that ridiculous site to the article, and everything will be super. Thanks :> Doc talk 11:28, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Could you tell me why you claim this biography is a non-fiction novel? It's possible that I'm missing something, but do you realize that this snarky classification comes off as sneaky vandalism? I hope you have a source for this. Viriditas (talk) 03:31, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
- I did a little bit of research on this, and I found that all instances of "non-fiction novel" in regards to this book appear to directly trace back to your edits on Wikipedia. Lacking a response and any supporting sources for your claim, I've changed "non-fiction novel" to "historical biography". Your classification of this book as a "non-fiction novel" appears to be part of a larger controversy that exists outside of Wikipedia. Please do not restore it unless you have excellent sources supporting it. Viriditas (talk) 12:29, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
You should come hang out with us on the internetz!
[edit]Hi! I wanted to let you know that we have created an IRC channel for "countering systemic bias one new editor at a time", aka closing the gender gap! Come hang out at #wikimedia-gendergap if that subject interests you. We hope this channel can serve as a safe haven to hang out, talk about Wiki, brainstorming, increasing women's participation in Wikimedia, article alerts and foster friendships. I hope you join us! (And if you need any IRC help, just let me know!) See you there! SarahStierch (talk) 22:34, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Marx
[edit]You weren't patronizing, don't worry. My comments on talk pages express my perspective, which is this: Although I know many reliable sources define Judaism as the "religion" of the Jews, I do not. I share the view of some historians and rabbis that Judaism encompasses all of those attitudes, beliefs, actions that mark Jewish identity. I believe that Jews are sharply divided over what "Judaism" is, as well as what are the criteria are for being Jewish - but to me, the point is tha answers to the question "who is a Jew" and "what is Judaism" are intimately connected precisely because the answer, or answers, or whatever the answer is, it depends on what Jews believe, and what Jews believe is a consequence of both their history, relations among themselves, and relations with gentiles.
My problem with popular attempts to define "Jew" and "Judaism" as contrasting or distinct concepts of categories is this: every one I have read assumes a prior definition of "nation" (or "ethnicity" or 'race") and "religion" as if these definitions are objective, when in fact these definitions reflect the historical experience of other nations and religions. In fact, I think the very distinction between nationality and religion is a product of recent European history, and if it reflects the experiences of other places and times, it nevertheless is certainly not universal or objective. Different social scientists and historians may have tried to come up with "objective" definitions of nationality and religion, but these definitions are in my view nevefr objective, they always express a particular point of view that is informed by particular experiences.
That is why, for me, "Jewishness" and "Judaism" are the same thing - I think the underlying distinction between religion and nationality is alien to Jewish history and simply not a very useful way to understand Jews and Jewish history. I think people get hung up on attempts to come up with objective definitions of (and thus distinctions between) Jewishness and Judaism, when the real (really important, really interesting, really meaningful) distinction is between different at times antagonistic or conflicting, understandings of whatever "Jewishness/Judaism" means.
When it comes actually editing articles of course I try to comply with RS and V. I know that many reliable sources express the view that there is a fundamental and objective distinction between Jewishness and Judaism and they should be represented but there are also reliable sources that express my view and - when relevant - they too should be represented.
I am replying to your comment here rather than on the Marx talk page because I do not want to start a huge tangent. You may not share my view. I do not think anything you may say will change my mind, but I am not trying to change your mind, only to explain to you why I use certain words the way I do, in response to your comment. Best, Slrubenstein | Talk 15:41, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 1
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited National Intelligence Priorities Framework, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Classified (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:10, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Personal infoboxes in relation to patriotism and nationalism
[edit]Hi Gold1618,
I saw your name on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Discrimination#Participants listing.
There is a discussion at Template talk:Infobox person#Citizenship suggesting a change of emphasis to a Citizenship entry from the Nationality entry.
The idea is to give more facilitation to Patriotism instead of Nationalism and also to allow more freedom of expression in regards to terminologies used.
Contributions are welcomed but may be worth checking last edit to check progress first :) Regards Gregkaye (talk) 20:59, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ARBPIA notification
[edit]
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.In addition, as a result of a recent ruling, all IP editors, accounts with fewer than 500 edits, and accounts with less than 30 days tenure are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. RolandR (talk) 23:38, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
[edit]
|
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Gold1618. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Gold1618. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Gold1618. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Edit-a-thon at Vanderbilt for REAL Symposium
[edit]Hope you can join us this Saturday!--Heathart (talk) 18:22, 21 March 2019 (UTC)