User talk:Gokfan

January 2008

Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Gordon Ramsay. If you would like to experiment please use the sandbox. Thank you. Redfarmer (talk) 13:30, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Gordon Ramsay, you will be blocked from editing. Redfarmer (talk) 13:32, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Gordon Ramsay, you will be blocked from editing. Redfarmer (talk) 13:36, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Tana Ramsay

A tag has been placed on Tana Ramsay requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dekisugi (talk) 13:51, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hotter Than My Daughter?

The article Hotter Than My Daughter? has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant content

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:15, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hotter Than My Daughter?

A tag has been placed on Hotter Than My Daughter? requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. R12056 (talk) 00:49, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Gam bourdain-game-face 490.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Gam bourdain-game-face 490.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 21:44, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011 warnings

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 99.0.81.41 (talk) 22:47, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 99.153.142.106 (talk) 04:51, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 99.153.142.106 (talk) 21:42, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

By way of fuller explanation, and to clarify should administrative action be sought, the content you're continuing to add isn't reliably sourced [1], may constitute copyright infringement, and apparently just for fun, you lately included a bit of sneaky vandalism [2]. This follows by a few hours another series of questionable edits [3], [4]. 99.153.142.106 (talk) 22:04, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Prince William of Wales, you may be blocked from editing. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 21:35, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kate Middleton, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tvoz/talk 04:06, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 17:00, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Heads up

Hello. You have a new message at Talk:Anthony Bourdain's talk page.