User talk:Goingforthetruth
File copyright problem with File:Lawrence picture, copied from his GW law school profile for Wikipedia page.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Lawrence picture, copied from his GW law school profile for Wikipedia page.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 01:15, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- This photo is copyrighted. Since the subject is living and a photo could be taken at any time, the picture did not qualify for non-free use under the current interpretations of the law to which we are subject here. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:50, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Your edit to the Brandeis article
[edit]If this is true, please find a reliable source. Amazon is notoriously a venue for spamming, vanity insertions, and general mishegoss. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:47, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
- We need an impartial third party, such as a book or magazine article; not a Brandeis U. source. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:40, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
I have reverted your addition of Perry for reasons I will address on the talk page - this is not a comment on whether same sex marriages should or should not be allowed, but on the nature of landmark cases and the citation you used. Please join me at the talk page to discuss it per WP:BRD. Regards, GregJackP Boomer! 19:20, 5 August 2010 (UTC)