User talk:Godzillawolf
May 2010
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page List of iCarly characters has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tommy2010 23:35, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 13:25, 16 May 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
New message.
First of all, the section you are adding the sentence "Following Decade's death at the hands of Kiva-la, all Riders killed as a result of the Rider War and by Decade are revived as their world's are restored." to does not cover the events of the 2nd film. That is the section for the events of episodes 30 and 31.
Secondly, the sentence does not serve any purpose for the section anyway, as it is a direct summary of the conclusion of the film rather than being a general discussion of the events.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:43, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
- I understand, please note I made this edits in good faith. I hope the reedit is in the correct section. Godzillawolf (talk) 02:38, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
- You understood that the section was wrong, but the content is not important for the character list.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 04:59, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
This is a rule across the project: do not write your own ideas on a topic on Wikipedia. There is no reason you should be trying to explain why some Final Form Rides appear and others do not or the sea cucumber running gag as neither were explicitly explained by the show or movies. Your brain is not the source for information on the shows or movies. The shows or movies are the only source, unless someone related to the show has written something about it.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 04:00, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Character biographies
[edit]In general, we here at Wikipedia have been attempting to cut down on some of the excessive plot summary in the Kamen Rider character biographies. That is why they were so short and were missing specific information from the films and episodes. I have undone this edit because it does not give out any information essential to understanding the character.
Also, please try to avoid writing in the past tense when writing character biographies as it treats the events as historical events. By writing about fiction in the present tense, it avoids this little snag.
So for the future, be short and concise, only focusing on the important bits.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:03, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- His lust for power is one of the biggest points about his character that is his biggest motive, thus it is an important point. At least the way I see it, so if you have a reason its not, then tell me. Godzillawolf (talk) 23:09, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- The biographies just need to be as short and concise as possible.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:24, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- But being short and concise doesn't mean we can cut out a prounced character trait that is part of what defines a character. Isaka is driven completely by power, obtaining it, testing his own, getting more power. The sole reason he got the Weather Memory was because he become obcessed with the power of the Terror Gaia Memory and craved to have it. His lust for power is the focal point of Isaka's character and his primary motivation. Godzillawolf (talk) 02:53, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
- The biographies just need to be as short and concise as possible.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:24, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
OOO
[edit]Do not add the fandom's opinions on W and OOO being in the same canon. Kuuga and Agito being in the same canon is even less supported by anything.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 02:26, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
- Kuuga and Agito was confirmed, loosely, but they say that G3's armor was meant to fight the Grongi. Reguardless, there's the fact that A to Z is canon, that's shown when the aftermath is seen in the very next episode. That means Ozu had to have appeared in his world. While Double and Decade have teamed up, it was shown they were in alternate worlds. To our present knowledge, Ozu can't transcend worlds. Plus, in the following episodes, we're specifically shown that the O Medals are known to the X Foundation. I'm not saying this is set in stone or anything, but don't you think it should at least be mentioned somewhere? Godzillawolf (talk) 02:37, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
- There is nothing to say that Kamen Rider Double and Kamen Rider OOO take place in the same continuity. The only thing that has happened in that episode are two references to the film, and a reference to the upcoming series. Saying anything other than that is original research.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 03:02, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thus why at the end I said I'm not saying its set in stone. Shouldn't one of the pages at least state that there were those references on the OOO page in some way? Godzillawolf (talk) 03:21, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
- If it's not set in stone do not say it at all.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:00, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thus why at the end I said I'm not saying its set in stone. Shouldn't one of the pages at least state that there were those references on the OOO page in some way? Godzillawolf (talk) 03:21, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
- There is nothing to say that Kamen Rider Double and Kamen Rider OOO take place in the same continuity. The only thing that has happened in that episode are two references to the film, and a reference to the upcoming series. Saying anything other than that is original research.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 03:02, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Shinkenger
[edit]According our policies, we need verifiable and reliably sourced content. An informal statement from a producer is not good enough to say that the 18th season is based off of Shinkenger.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 03:42, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Godzillawolf. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)