User talk:Godlover32795

June 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page A. E. Wilder-Smith has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 18:16, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page A. E. Wilder-Smith. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. e0steven(☎Talk|✍Contrib) 19:29, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to A. E. Wilder-Smith

Hi. Your edits to that article are problematic. First, there are serious formatting issues. For example, you are breaking references as you can see here. Second, Wikipedia articles are not intended to be testimonial hagiographies but rather biographies. Some of the details about his career may be relevant but the long quotes from Duane Gish and others are not encyclopedic. JoshuaZ (talk) 19:36, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also the content describing Wilder-Smith's career that you are adding appears to be text from elsewhere. Wikipedia can only accept content that was written by you. Otherwise, it is a copyright violation. If you have any further questions please feel free to contact me on my talk page User talk:JoshuaZ. JoshuaZ (talk) 19:42, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, we really can't accept copyrighted text. I've rephrased some of it and added it in an acceptable form. Also, you may also want to sign your posts. You can do so with four tildes ~~~~ which the software automatically replaces with your username and time of the edit. Also, please see Wikipedia's policy about repeatedly reinserting or removing content. In general, it is a better idea to have a discussion on the article talk page about what one wants to add rather than try to repeatedly add something. Talk:A. E. Wilder-Smith is where you may wish to bring this up. JoshuaZ (talk) 19:46, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:43, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to A. E. Wilder-Smith. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Alansohn (talk) 22:35, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to A. E. Wilder-Smith. Bsadowski1 (talk) 22:36, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on A. E. Wilder-Smith. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Aunt Entropy (talk) 16:09, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please understand, your edit of "He proved evolution wrong" is not true; it will not stand, and if you add it again, it will be considered vandalism and dealt with accordingly. Aunt Entropy (talk) 16:19, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]