User talk:Goddessofmarshmellows

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:09, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Goddessofmarshmellows, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Goddessofmarshmellows! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Missvain (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:30, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Goddessofmarshmellows (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked for incorrect reasons. I have been contributing to the talk page for Andrew Wakefield, and have posted evidence of statements that are misleading and incorrect. Some of the statements against Andrew Wakefield are biased and defamatory. I didn't ask for the page to be re-written to support Andrew Wakefield, however I DID request that some points should be corrected as they are clearly misleading statements. The admin, JzG, blocked me for my contributions to the talk page for this reason "Clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopedia". This cannot possibly be true considering my substantial accurate information backed up by Primary sources.

Decline reason:

Agree with blocking admin; your arguments are examples of what we call WP:SYNTH. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:01, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Given your vehement, albeit misjudged, defence of Andrew Wakefield in the face of all the evidence, how do you explain the decision by the General Medical Council to strike him from the Medical Practitioners' Register, on the basis of the allegations which you discount?--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:54, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]