User talk:Gobears12
| This user is a student editor in Washington_University_in_St._Louis/Gender_and_Politics_in_Global_Perspective_(Spring_2023) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Gobears12, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Brianda and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 00:46, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
You have an overdue training assignment.
[edit]Please complete the assigned training modules. --Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:59, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Peer Review "Women in Conservatism in the United States"
[edit]The article’s overall status is very strong. It gives a detailed history of conservative women in the U.S., it is well-written, very well-sourced, and well-organized. The drafts by @Gobears12 and @Coconut818 make valuable contributions to the history and modern developments in the movement. I especially like the details about women in the JBS. My suggestions for improvements are below:
- Add a section on Nikki Haley under “In 21st-century politics.” Just because she has not run for president yet does not mean she is not a prominent conservative woman on the national stage
- Expand on what you mean by Amy Coney Barrett “leans more conservative.” In what ways? How have those views been expressed during her time as a judge and now justice? How do her views connect to / build upon those mentioned in the history section?
- Consider moving the “Trump Era” and new “#MeToo movement” sections to under the “In the 21st century” header rather than under the “history” header. That is where I would expect to find that information.
With the drafted additions, I would say the article is approaching completeness. Some additions should be made (Nikki Haley, for example), but overall it addresses most relevant content. It is well-developed.