User talk:Goattender

Your submission at Articles for creation

Demand Modeling, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

APerson (talk!) 01:49, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Hannes Thor Smárason, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

RadioFan (talk) 12:41, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Jon Flint (August 6)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jon Flint.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kadzi (talk) 18:16, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Goattender, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to RapidMiner may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

provides data mining and machine learning procedures including: data loading and transformation ([[Extract, transform, load]] ( ETL), data preprocessing and visualization, predictive analytics and

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:01, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi Goattender. Would you mind explaining how you obtained this photograph of Hannes Þór Smárason? The EXIF data lists this photographer as the copyright holder and it therefore seems unlikely that it is your own work as you claimed when you uploaded it. I'm concerned that this is an indication that you were paid to write the article as the photograph is clearly a PR shot and was taken only a few weeks before your edits to the article. This is obviously also pertinent to your edits to OMICS Publishing Group which has a long history of editors with a conflict of interest. Please bear in mind that while in 2013, paid editing did not require any disclosure to be made, the sites Terms of Use now require a a disclosure if you are being paid. Regards SmartSE (talk) 22:05, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Your recent editing history at OMICS Publishing Group shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 06:45, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note I do agree with Banedon, DGG and Randykitty, I am merging the sister concern article OMICS Publishing Group with the parent article OMICS Group Inc. I am not sure to imply disputes/controversies to parent article from sister concern. ^{[neutrality is disputed]}can be checked later, I am copying all disputes/controversies to parent. You are advised to participate in editing. Dentking07 (talk) 05:29, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Demand modeling

The article Demand modeling has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This buzzword soup is a mish-mash synthesis of sources that don't mention the phrase "demand modeling". It's also written as a personal essay. I can't find any decent sources on which to base an article about this topic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reyk _YO! 10:53, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]