User talk:GoForMoe

House/Senate composition images

Hi, I know it's a minor issue, but I feel uncomfortable looking at those rectangles... is it possible to make them squares? Also, a heads up that the old images are still in use at Australian federal election, 2010, Next Australian federal election, and Parliament of Australia, these will need updating. Thanks. Timeshift (talk) 00:30, 27 November 2011 (UTC) Also, is the CLP a different shade of blue? I can't recognise their rectangle on the Senate image. Timeshift (talk) 00:34, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Done and done. Yeah the Senate CLP seat slipped my mind, thanks for reminding me. --GoForMoe (talk) 05:08, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! Two more (last) requests... could you make the WA Nat colour in the image slightly lighter... half way to the Green colour? Just for maximum contrast so there's no confusion. Second, Katter is officially from Katter's Australian Party and no longer an independent so the current image should really reflect that... issue is, what colour. Perhaps a darker grey maybe, in lack of appetite for another red? Timeshift (talk) 05:47, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, was wondering what the overall consensus on KAP was - what is your view on the situation in Queensland Parliament of Queensland and Queensland Legislative Assembly contradict each other right now. Wasn't there also someone who is still a Queensland Party MP who won't join KAP, or was that outside parliament?

I don't think the WA Nats should have a different colour, Crook sits in the Nationals party room, so I think it is fine to consider him in the same party as the rest of the Nationals. His position as a square on the cross bench should be enough to demonstrate he isn't in coalition. --GoForMoe (talk) 05:57, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

The issue is that KAP wasn't officially registered. It is now, and Katter's official parliamentary bio doesn't mention independent anymore, it has KAP. The wiki debates on it kinda ceased when that happened. Timeshift (talk) 07:25, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

I've done a graphic for Queensland, how do the KAP seats look? --GoForMoe (talk) 07:47, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Good, but the double red confuses me more than double green does... Timeshift (talk) 08:51, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

The problem is that there's no other party colour besides red. We basically have a choice between inaccuracy or being difficult to see, I think the later is better. --GoForMoe (talk) 09:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. Can you make the federal changes required? When you have the time... Timeshift (talk) 10:00, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the changes, but just another FYA, Australian_House_of_Reps_Sept_2010.svg has 45 Libs and 20 LNP rather than 44 Libs and 21 LNP. Timeshift (talk) 23:17, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

scratch that --GoForMoe (talk) 14:11, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Now fixed. --GoForMoe (talk) 14:13, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

If you could have a look at Talk:Australian House of Representatives#New update required please :) Timeshift (talk) 03:24, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Spelling

I know there was no spelling mistake, but one of the categories says it is set in Australia which is wrong.--Collingwood26 (talk) 13:05, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

No relevance?

How can you possibly know about the now and the future if you do not know about the past? Timeshift (talk) 16:29, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

By reading other articles and linking to the relevant sections in a small section of text in the article that gives it the context that the particular article gives. Who won the 1949 election has no direct relation to the next election. It is fine in the articles giving an overview of history, like the articles on the house of reps and the parliament, though I'd suggest it's bad enough it is reprinted verbatim in both. A description of the message that you can get out of that table, and a link to it in another article is sufficient. I'd suggest the polling figure history is more relevant to the section it is in, but could also be replaced with a text summary and perhaps an article on election opinion polling in Australia. Either way, that table is a massive amount more detail than is necessary in the article, and is available in at least two other articles I can find. --GoForMoe (talk) 18:15, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

It is not a massive table in comparison - and it's at the end of the article anyway! It is an excellent concise wrapup of which has a high significance to future elections. Timeshift (talk) 23:40, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Australian federal election, 2013#Polling

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	Well done, great outcome! Timeshift (talk) 06:17, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Polling commentary

You're trying to insist on your contribution. Can you please remove the disputed content until you have consensus for it as the onus is on you. Thanks. Timeshift (talk) 08:47, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Non-free use of File:101.3 Sea FM Central Coast.png

Thank you for uploading File:101.3 Sea FM Central Coast.png. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:51, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Aus 2013 graph

Is there any chance you can update the graphs at Australian federal election, 2013? I have no idea how to, and an editor is whingeing about it. -Rrius (talk) 09:36, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

I did the data entry for the update, and I tried downloading Python and matiplot or whatever it is, but when I tried to run it, it said there was no numpy module, so I looked that up, and it required a further download of a C+ compiler and a comfort level with programming tools that I just don't have. -Rrius (talk) 10:19, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikiproject: Australian Broadcasting

Gday GoForMoe,

Thought it might be good to try and coordinate our efforts with like-minded editors.

Nbound (talk) 00:31, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Smooth Chill (Australian radio station)

The article Smooth Chill (Australian radio station) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

tagged for notability 12+ years, probably won't ever be notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 15 May 2022 (UTC)