User talk:Gnozwovvle

February 2013

Hello, I'm Coffeepusher. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to David Miscavige because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Coffeepusher (talk) 17:34, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at David Miscavige. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: David Miscavige was changed by Gnozwovvle (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862654 on 2013-02-17T13:09:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:10, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you add defamatory content, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 99.136.254.88 (talk) 13:44, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's not defamatory though it it? It's a statement of fact. Gnozwovvle (talk) 13:48, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ruslik_Zero 17:59, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Percy Pissnose (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Someguy1221 (talk) 02:27, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]