User talk:Gnostics
|
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. However, please remember that Wikipedia is not a soapbox or a place for self-promotion, and edits that seem intended solely for such purposes are removed. If you wish to experiment with editing, please use the Wikipedia:Sandbox. Thank you. Michaelbusch (talk) 19:45, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
- Please also read the Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Your edits indicate that you are not making the distinction of discussing an article and discussing the article's subject - which is critical. Michaelbusch (talk) 19:54, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Watchlist
[edit]- { This section originally was on Gnostics' user page, placed there by the user "John Carter" (who is now blocked).
- Moved here by Steue (talk) 11:36, 30 April 2023 (UTC) }
What your watchlist shows is the name of the page, the amount of addition or subtraction to the article in the last change to that page, and the username of the party who made the change. Basically, they're more or less listed there so that you can know how the article was changed. Hitting the "(hist)" will let you see what the exact changes were, and also have a link to any earlier revisions which don't appear on your watchlist. I know that that might be clear as mud, but if you have any further questions, please feel free to ask. John Carter 14:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Pardon?
[edit]I'm afraid I do not know what you are talking about. I have not, to my knowledge, ever asked to talk with you about Titus. I did locate the comment you made there, which was removed by another editor because it appeared to be off-topic, and possibly cut and pasted from a primary source. I'm not sure why you think the fact that Titus perhaps had similar hair to Martin Luther had anything to do with his commemoration on the Lutheran calendar of saints. Pastordavid 15:53, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- The hair was only a descriptive factor, some people desire to know what people look like. I could picture Noah, Abel, Cain, St. Stephen, Hipocrates and others. It was not a cut and paste, I have on occasion done special duties. Titus, to the best of my recollection, is exonerated to Saint in the Lutheran Church for carrying the cross, his statement about having Jesus as a son, the ambiguaty of losing his testicles and his devoted love to the Church. If you have the slightest semblence of Time, you could go talk with him yourself. I intend to admit discussion on Saint Stephen, as he once requested that I "stand in his place" as he was being stoned, as a lesson toward my humility and how I should "properly die." He would not tell me why he was being stoned, although I agreed that it was not necessary for me to "know." The Church does not like any form of vengeance by the deceased after death, especially in cases of having been murdered? Is this what I was to have learned? I have been murdered over 28 Times and upon one Time, a Minister told me that I was not to Forgive the killer. I'm sure that you could understand the position a child would be placed in, not Forgiving. Possibly it is my Manner of Forgiving that was brought into question. I have also learned that it is not proper to send the murderer to Hell, although they would prefer the cold one over the hot one. Possibly the best place to send them is to the Sun, as I have learned; the fact remains, though, that Roman Catholics prefer to be sent down into the Earth rather than "up and down" into the Sun. This has something to do with their Father being Cain, as far as I have found. I once told a Lutheran Pastor (Missouri Synod) that I had died many Times and his response was that I have been naughty and that I should have lived but "once." Jesus is said to be the "first at everything," and was therefore me the first Time (was he the Devil as well?); although it may be that I am originally a Child of Abel, one of Man Kind. I was stated to have been "the first born of the dead," therefore Jesus has been me more than one Time? What is your take on this? Gnostics 18:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- I am also known as others. You must have misread the Titus discussion. Titus looks nothing like Martin Luther. Tyre's hair appears to be similar to Martin Luther's hair. I am a bit familiar with Martin Luther, as I once requested him to attempt to save the soil dwelling beaver of Europe, as World War I was very hard on their existence due to the gas attacks (it was also very hard on the other wildlife and domesticated animals; camel had to be imported to Europe from Arabia to do the field plowing due to the deaths of so many horses). Gnostics 20:02, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Your edits
[edit]
Please [s]top adding nonsensical material to Wikipedia. Review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and stop your disruptive editing. Further such activity may be considered vandalism, even if it is confined to talk pages. Michaelbusch (talk) 17:58, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- ==
- It would be nice if Wikipedia would not censor relevant topics: Governor Booth Gardner's eye color. It came to my attention that a brown eyed fellow became, miraculously, a blue eyed fellow during his tenure as Governor of the State of Washington. An eye change color is usually an indication of spiritual possession; thus the state was in jeopardy of separation of Church and s(S)tate clause. It would be very kind to have two color photos of the Governor showing that he was originally brown eyed, and then at a later date, he became blue eyed.
- Also of notation is that he was originally a child/kid of the streets, a waif that the Mr. Weyerhaeuser took under his arm and helped lift up off the streets and out of the gutters of homelessness (and parentless) to become a better man. I don't know the particulars of his parentage of that Time, but he was said to be a waif. I suspect that his Mother has/had attempted to obtain the fortune from her Son since another Time? Gnostics (talk) 23:03, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
June 2015
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 07:05, 27 June 2015 (UTC)Since 2007..! You can pat yourself on the back for flying under the radar for so long, but it's over. Bishonen | talk 07:06, 27 June 2015 (UTC).
Gnostics (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Your reason here Gnostics (talk) 19:54, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Huon (talk) 20:04, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
The above appears to be a personal attack and affront upon my "Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness" and Religious Freedoms of Pactice, Expression, Effect, etc. . .. Gnostics (talk) 19:54, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Gnostics (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Your reason here Gnostics (talk) 21:58, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 22:15, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
==What I wrote on "Stoning" page is not an "lulz" nor an "lol" matter. You should all be ashamed of yourselves for having a Father Cain of such manners. Honor thy Father the best that you can. I am being attacked on Religious Grounds. Gnostics (talk) 21:58, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Gnostics (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Your reason here Gnostics (talk) 23:03, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Another request not addressing the reason of blocking? Talk page access revoked. Max Semenik (talk) 01:34, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Would you care to review my contributions to the "Erythema chronicum migrans" page? Gnostics (talk) 23:03, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- A couple of constructive edits in 2009, that's nice. Bishonen | talk 23:32, 28 June 2015 (UTC).