User talk:Gnomsovet

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to Liberal Democratic Party of Russia. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 22:02, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I not member what or party, but I well know political system to Russia and do not love when opinion only one sides is given for absolute truth. Prove its not prejudice on base of the political program LDPR http://www.ldpr.ru/partiya/prog/ Otherwise you break Wikipedia:NPOVGnomsovet (talk) 22:21, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Liberal Democratic Party of Russia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 22:28, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You preconceived and do not want to prove on base of the political program to parties characterized by you as nationalistic you standpoint but simply subject to political censorship different from your glancesGnomsovet (talk) 23:24, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some suggestions

Hello, some suggestions. Party logos can indeed be used in English Wikipedia articles describing the party concerned, but in that case a more detailed explanation ('rationale') is needed. If you don't want your images be possibly deleted, please provide it. Secondly, regarding the disputes you have with me and apparently with other users, too. Wikipedia does indeed rely on 'neutral point of view' as you emphasises on my talk page. But in addition, Wikipedia opposes soliciting, soapboxing and propaganda of all types. We don't really base the articles on political parties on points of the party programme and the party's self-description. Instead, we use other observations, preferably scholarly ones. --Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 19:45, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Political program to parties this not simply self-description but that does what managament to action is this party. About russian party of the statement many preconceived not confirmed fact and are founded on idea politologist by well-mannered 'cold war'. The Political manifestoes party much better describe their politician than whose or not supported real documentary fact opinion. Such image nationalistic possible to name republican party USA unless turn attention on programme statements but only only on whose that opinion Gnomsovet (talk) 22:02, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User notice: temporary 3RR block

Regarding reversions[1] made on March 2 2009 to Liberal Democratic Party of Russia

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

The duration of the block is 24 hours. William M. Connolley (talk) 23:06, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:ODD Solidarnost.png

Thanks for uploading File:ODD Solidarnost.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Note that if you continue like that (adding your own opinions or soapboxing based on a party's propaganda leaflets), you can end up being banned very soon. I am getting tired of your disruptive editing. Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 10:08, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This you concern with the war of the reading, propaganda and censorship closing war with vandalism. You vandal themselves. I only make section to normal form. You nor than except censorships do not concern with. I understand that this your work. But in vain you think that network community such stupid to not to notice the censorship in Wikipedia although and realized by hidden image? ;) Gnomsovet (talk) 10:16, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ну вот, уважаемый, теперь совершенно ясно: вы здесь только пропаганды ради. Но Wikipedia, это не газета День, не программа «600 секунд». Если вы не умеете заниматься конструктивным вкладом, я уверен, что вы будете разблокированы в самые кратчайшие сроки. --Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 10:34, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Да нет уважаемы это вы здесь пропаганды ради. Обвиняете партии на основе личных предубеждений вымарывая все ссылки не соответсвующие вашему мнению. Я то как раз нейтрален и оцениваю партии по их политической деятельности и политической программе. А не по указанию вашингтонского обкома партии. А это всё просто ретранслируется в ру.нет для начала а там посмотрим. Вы можете обманывать англоязычных но в России все прекрасно знают какая партия чем дышит. Можете блокировать я вам только спасибо скажу ;). А невзоровского мусора нет уже лет двадцать вы не знали ? хех Gnomsovet (talk) 10:40, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-paste moves

Hello. Please abstain from performing copy-paste article moves as you did with Fair Russia. Copy-paste moves are undesirable because they split edit histories between two articles, which is against the attribution requirements imposed by the GFDL. If an article cannot be moved using the "Move" tab at the top of the screen, you need to submit a move request. Thank you.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 13:19, March 16, 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 22:30, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Glospace komplekt 5f2cd.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Glospace komplekt 5f2cd.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:25, 16 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 15:25, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Ldpr.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ldpr.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:13, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pravoe Delo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pravoe Delo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 13:15, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Patriotsofrussia.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Patriotsofrussia.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 12:48, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ldpr.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ldpr.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:13, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. [2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Koraskadi (talk • contribs) 00:17, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 01:20, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gnomsovet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

contrived reason for blocking the administrator of the defender of the Nazis.

This account is my only one and I do not have another account. Yes, I am not the only user of the computer - but this does not mean that everyone who used it is me.

I was blocked after I caught a Korean Nazi User:Koraskadi on trying to ignore and manipulate the rules. And if Wikipedia prematurely protects the Nazis, it means that those countries who block Wikipedia are right to block it.Gnomsovet (talk) 01:26, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Even assuming that you are two people, joining a dispute for the sole reason of supporting your acquaintance is meatpuppetry and is not permitted. Personal attacks of course are not permitted either. You'll appreciate that the admins have enforced "the execution of project rules" by blocking you. Huon (talk) 01:47, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Because you have continued your personal attacks in your unblock request, I have revoked access to this page.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:35, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh goodness; you are a treat. HalfShadow 01:29, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ODD Solidarnost.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ODD Solidarnost.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:04, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]