User talk:Gmcarlisle
| This user is a student editor in University_of_Florida/African_American_Literature_I_(Fall_2020) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Gmcarlisle, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 12:46, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Some stroopwafels for you!
[edit]
|
Nice work!! Mr.Ek0 (talk) 16:32, 18 November 2020 (UTC) |
Peer-Review -- Suggestions
[edit]As someone who did not know much about Martha Gruening, I really enjoyed reading the information you provided about her in your edits, and I liked how you organized your paragraphs. If I were to suggest anything worth improving, it would be to review your section titles and to look for sentences that may seem subjective. For example, the “Early Life and Education” section seems to have more information about Martha’s family and her education, rather than her early life and education. Although I might be incorrect, I think a title like “Family and Education” could be more suitable for that section. Besides that, you did a fantastic job editing this page.
Mortrick (talk) 23:17, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Peer Review
[edit]You did a great job putting Martha Gruening’s article together. The lead is clear and concise and previews the rest of the article. The content you added created a well-rounded view of Gruenning’s life, especially the things added about education, and notable works. The only thing I noticed is in the works section there are some words used like “brilliantly” “warmly” and “storm of” that can be seen as bias or embellishments which aren’t necessary to the article. The next thing I noticed was that the article is missing a legacy section that provides info on her passing and how she impacted her community or family. It’s awesome that you were able to find a photo of the Gomez Mill House and the story behind the house that added more insight into Gruenning’s personal life which made your article well rounded. The overall tone of the article was neutral but in the works section, there are some imbalances in neutrality. The sources are solid and directly from the publication which is awesome, and the article is well organized. Overall the article was clear and informative with strong details on Martha Gruenning’s life, childhood, adulthood, and story. Good luck with the rest of your article!