User talk:Glvbk

Glvbk, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Glvbk! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Edits

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Seasider53 (talk) 05:34, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Seed of Chucky, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Meters (talk) 02:45, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I won’t. Glvbk (talk) 02:48, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And don't add your opinions as you did here [1]. Meters (talk) 02:51, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

🙄 Glvbk (talk) 02:53, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Film serial killers and Horror icon. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:23, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Horror icon

Please stop being disruptive. I've already reverted your changes several times and explained that they were poor. You can't change random links to articles which have citations for no reason. And you also shouldn't link to draft pages.★Trekker (talk) 13:18, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not being disruptive I’m adding content Jesus Christ. Glvbk (talk) 16:33, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So when I’m done with the draft I can add it? Glvbk (talk) 16:33, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And I was the one who added Warwick Davis are you going to remove that too?! Glvbk (talk) 16:35, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Huh f*cker? Glvbk (talk) 04:16, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have no right to swear at people. And yes people will remove anything you add that is not sourced.★Trekker (talk) 18:35, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Everytime you remove it I will add it back. Glvbk (talk) 18:38, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.★Trekker (talk) 19:43, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fred 2: Night of the Living Fred, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Horror. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Draft:Chucky (TV series), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — YoungForever^(talk) 22:28, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cult of Chucky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Horror.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Do you somehow expect me not to notice that you're changing sources entries at Horror icon again? Please stop doing that.★Trekker (talk) 00:30, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at The Shining (film). Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 00:47, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Chucky (TV series), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — YoungForever^(talk) 03:40, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Film serial killer

It's not suddenly going to stop being a problem that you're trying to insert non-articles into the listing.★Trekker (talk) 06:05, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ★Trekker (talk) 21:08, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. ★Trekker (talk) 16:10, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.★Trekker (talk) 18:02, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 21:23, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of LFAF (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:21, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Overlook (TV series) (June 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This appears to be a future television series. Planned television series seldom satisfy television notability, and this is not an exception, because it does not satisfy general notability in advance of airing. See also Wikipedia is not a crystal ball.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Overlook (TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Overlook (TV series), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:26, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Leprechaun (character)

Hello, Glvbk. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Leprechaun (character), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:03, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Leprechaun (character)

Hello, Glvbk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Leprechaun".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:01, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]