User talk:Glossophile

I concur with the criticism that this article had ADVERTISING content. I have deleted ALL of the offending material.

1. Paragraph #2 (beginning with “The importance of the Proprioceptive Method” and finishing with “which is made available on that website.” has been entirely removed.

2. Under ==Summary.==, ===Future work is still needed.===, the phrase “In spite of its recent dominance in spoken English instruction” has been removed since is was a reference to paragraph #2.

3. Under ==Endnotes==, ====References====, the footnote “ Learning a Spoken Second Language, http://www.freeenglishnow.com/lsfl.pdf and Learning Spoken English http://www.freeenglishnow.com/lse.pdf” has been removed.

With this edit, there is nothing in the article which suggests advertising..

Nonetheless, the PROPRIOCEPTIVE METHOD is far from being merely a theoretical article. The method is widely used with an approximate distribution of 6,000 CDs of the complete course each month. The new language learning method developed for it merits mention in Wikipedia. I believe the remainder of the article is well researched and documented, and that the article now makes a definite contribution to the field of language education.

PROPRIOCEPTIVE is, of course, a word which can be used of many activities. (It is an adjective.) This article is precise, however, in identifying it as the PROPRIOCEPTIVE LANGUAGE LEARNING METHOD.

Thanks for your understanding in my first attempt in submitting. I made a mistake. Sorry.

I would appreciate any further comments.

Glossophile

I am voluntarily removing this page. Both my format and style evidence my inexperience with Wiki submitting. Nonetheless, much appreciation to those of you who evaluated the article. I learned a great deal from you and hope to be back.

Thanks.

Glossophle.

October 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Proprioceptive Method, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Proprioceptive Method was changed by Glossophile (c) (t) deleting 13325 characters on 2007-10-25T16:32:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 16:32, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

regarding the blanking of Proprioceptive Method

Please don't blank the page. Let the discussion take its course. If you have comments to add to the Afd discussion, please do so. Personally, I think there is an article hiding in what you wrote, it just needs to be re-written. --Rocksanddirt 21:57, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stuttering

I have moved your recent addition to the Stuttering page to Talk:Stuttering for discussion as it is written in a promotional manner and links to an external site which is not a relaible source. Please discuss it there, thanks, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 14:16, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]