User talk:Gleonardos

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. 45Factoid44 (talk) 05:58, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. 45Factoid44 (talk) 06:31, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. 45Factoid44 (talk) 22:43, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Though I note other users have not welcomed you here, I thought it might be nice to have that instead of lots of warning templates on your page, so, welcome! Now, it might be a good idea to perhaps edit some other articles for a while, as you do indeed appear to have a conflict of interest with this one. I admire the neutrality with which you are approaching this page and I don't think, beyond perhaps a few word choices, that you're violating any Wikipedia policy. But, as a show of good faith to other editors here, it's always good for users in your position to build up a status as a respectable editor first before they drastically try to touch an article written about oneself. It can help avoid conflicts in the future. Regards, NcSchu_(Talk) 16:24, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why you can't edit your own article.

Hi. You and other editors seem to not understand why I take issue with you editing your own article. So, rather than warning you again, I will simply direct you here and give you and the editors confused a chance to familiarize yourselves with the policies and begin to do things in that manner instead. These provide a way that you can give your opinion on your own article without violating the policy or ruffling other editors feathers. Thanks and good luck to you. 45Factoid44 (talk) 22:01, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Leonardos

A tag has been placed on Leonardos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Deadly∀ssassin 07:51, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Leonardos, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Deadly∀ssassin 07:55, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Continued editing of your own article without submitting to talk page first for review

Hi. I notice that you're still editing your own article despite policies presented to you which advises against it and shows you how to suggest content for review and inclusion by third party editors. Please stop this or your actions will be reported to an administrator. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.5.66.240 (talk) 06:20, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I qualify as a third party editor. I've been monitoring this user's edits for neutrality. NcSchu_(Talk) 18:33, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]