User talk:Gjoe1973/Diablo Lake

Peer Review

Hi! I just completed your peer review on Diablo Lake and overall, super great job! I viewed the original article versus your draft and great job at adding so much content to it! I didn't have a ton of notes, but a few things that I mentioned in my official peer review were:

For the lead section, you can remove the header that says "Summary", as the leads usually don't have a header.
In the lead section, you mentioned kayaking and canoeing and the lead is only supposed to discuss stuff that is important in the rest of the article, but this topic is never mentioned again in the article so maybe consider either a) adding a section in the recreation section about kayaking/canoeing or b) remove this bit from the lead.
A couple of the sections I believe could use a little more information, specifically the Diablo Dam section and a few of the subtopics in the recreation section, as they are only a few sentences. So, if you have time maybe consider adding to that, but I know that we were only asked to write a few paragraphs for this assignment, so this isn't super necessary.

Overall really good first draft of the article, it looks really close to being able to go live! Let me know if you have any questions about the review.

Best,

Adrianna

Adrifaye (talk) 22:22, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

Hi, I peer reviewed your work and provided some suggestions. Overall, this is a useful article with well-written content. Looking forward to see the final version! Yuweij (talk) 20:53, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]