User talk:Giuseppe con parsimonia
NON COPIARE
July 2020
[edit]
Hello, I'm Megaman en m. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Latin, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Megaman en m (talk) 10:53, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
- Oki doki. I was a thinking dat e everybody was e know dat Italian is di closest language to original Latn because di French is di most differente. --Giuseppe con parsimonia (talk) 11:12, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Romani people, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.
I suggest that you also attempt to use correct English, as the way you are writing at present may cause people to confuse you with a troll. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 12:27, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
- My first language Italian. I still learning di English. --Giuseppe con parsimonia (talk) 18:01, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Italian Americans, you may be blocked from editing. Megaman en m (talk) 18:27, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Megaman en m (talk) 18:33, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 18:34, 22 July 2020 (UTC)Enough already
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ian.thomson (talk) 08:27, 24 July 2020 (UTC)- There was no legitimate reason for edits like this or this -- a recurring problem for you.
- Someone who can't read well enough to distinguish between the Romani and Romanians lacks the literacy necessary to edit.
- And I think you're lying when you say English isn't your first language. Someone learning English would learn how to spell "the" almost right away, which suggests that your use of "di" (in a paragraph that uses "the" correctly, no less!) is stereotypical imitation by a non-Italian troll. I don't expect that you correctly spelled it here and forgot how to spell it right elsewhere, it seems more plausible that you are just a troll.
- If your response is in any way an attempt to defend your actions, I will revoke talk page access. Ian.thomson (talk) 08:27, 24 July 2020 (UTC)