User talk:Stephinamibia

Welcome!

Hello, Stephinamibia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for helping us build a great free encyclopedia. We have five basic principles, but other than that, we advise that you be bold and edit. If you ever have any questions or need help, feel free to leave a message at the help desk, and other Wikipedia editors will be happy to assist you.

Thanks again and congratulations on becoming a Wikipedian!

P.S. New discussion threads for you will appear at the bottom of this page.

Giraffe conservation foundation

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Giraffe conservation foundation, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.speciesconservation.org/projects/Giraffe/374.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 07:19, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again.

What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you will probably not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

If you do intend to make useful contributions about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.
Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:37, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Need help?

Hi there! I'm a little worried that you stumbled into a block without really realizing why. If you need help or don't understand why you were blocked, please check out the Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, the Wikipedia:Teahouse or drop me an e-mail. Thanks! -- Gaurav (talk) 08:45, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Stephinamibia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

stephinamibia (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I had not checked the username guidelines and was not aware that the name of our charity was not a good idea. My apologies!

Decline reason:

Closed as another unblock request is open below. JohnCD (talk) 14:29, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here are a few key questions:

Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
Do you understand conflict of interest?
Do you understand that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, the subject must be notable?

You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the 3 important principles above. Max Semenik (talk) 11:31, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Stephinamibia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

stephinamibia (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I obviously didn't do my homework before hand with regards to the user name. I would now like to change it to a personal login associated to my person. I have been blocked for attempting to create an entry for our charity, the Giraffe Conservation Foundation. We focus on conservation management and research of giraffe in the wild - we are indeed the only organisation focusing on 'wild' giraffe. With giraffe numbers dropping rapidly across the continent, I believe that our organisation is of public interest and hence does warrant a wikipedia entry. I have tried to focus on giraffe conservation in Africa rather than the foundation in the text. Furthermore, as 'the' giraffe experts, we could give valuable input to other wiki entries, eg. on giraffe or wildlife conservation. Please don't block us for being inexperienced with wikipedia. This is my first experience with wikipedia and I find it somewhat overwhelming at the moment. I will happily review the entry on the charity and remove any contested aspects. There has not been any malicious intent in anything I am trying to do. I would certainly appreciate any help with creating a valuable wiki entry.

Accept reason:

I am unblocking you so you can change your username and continue working on your WP:AFC submission. However, I must tell you that you haven't yet understood all the policies here, particularly WP:CORP which is linked inside the first article JohnCD linked below. In short, you need to prove that the company is notable, with "notable" being defined the Wikipedia way (significant coverage in verifiable, reliable sources that are independent of your organization). I am skeptical that your organization meets the threshold criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia, but you are welcome to try to improve your submission to the point where a reviewer will pass it.

In any case, before you do anything else, go to WP:CHU/Simple and request a username change. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:20, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please read these pages:

and then give rather more definite answers to the three questions asked above. You can simply answer below here, you do not need to make another unblock request while the previous one is open. JohnCD (talk) 12:47, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. I have now read all the recommended links and understand the concepts. I would very much appreciate if you would allow me to log in under a new user name so that I can edit my previous entry to avoid any of the issues indicated above. I would further appreciate, if someone could review my article before publishing - is that possible? As stated above, I am new to Wikipedia and am only slowly understanding how this works. I also had a look at wiki articles on several other charities and organisations to gain a better understanding. Please understand that no harm was intended and if you guys decide that there should not be an article about the Giraffe Conservation Foundation than that is fine. However, I do believe that we should be given the chance to explain ourselves and not be punished for our lack of experience with wikipedia. This is a steep learning curve for us and I would very much appreciate some help and guidance. Thank you.

Giraffe Conservation Foundation

Hi Steph, I have to say that I'm surprised that you were unblocked without having to give a commitment not to edit articles in which you have a conflict of interest. However, I never interfere in the unblocking process for users I have blocked for obvious reasons. There were all sorts of problems.

The article was a copyright violation of this page, which is marked © Mohamed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund 2010, all rights reserved. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. But in any case the copyrighted text is far too promotional to be useful for Wikipedia's purposes, so there would not be any point in your jumping through all the hoops that are required.
It was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: is dedicated to securing a future... the first and only non-profit... is the key focal organisation... ever expanding network... close working relationship... increasing awareness and outreach... plight... Importantly, GCF supports dedicated and innovative research... This is recognised as fundamental... astonishing... something of a pyrrhic victory... the continent wide decline... is limited, incomplete and unreliable... This information is essential...solid, user-friendly and interactive database for all stakeholders... Giraffe are an important African icon and keystone species, and as such are a key tourism and economic driver... A greater understanding of giraffe numbers and their conservation and genetic status is absolutely key to securing their future and maximising their economic benefit... GCF is committed to ensuring... GCF is facilitating and supporting... the giraffe remains largely misunderstood and under-studied... GCF has been the driving force... unique animal... is also one of the more fragile... This brings with it a raft of challenges... are being refined... our understanding improving all the time... The Giraffe Conservation Foundation's vision is that of a sustainable future where all giraffe populations and (sub)species are protected and secure in the wild... firmly established himself as the world's foremost authority... an eclectic group... first and to date only international charity dedicated solely...
The lengthy mission statement is also just spam. This is an encyclopaedia, not a free soapbox, you must stick to facts.
It did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. I get the impression that this is a small operation, to establish notability you need to provide evidence of significant third-party coverage in reliable sources. Info on eg staff numbers and funding would also help.
You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. Thank you for declaring your interest. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Wikipedia:Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Wikipedia:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.

I'm not prepared to post the deleted text since it is copyright material. If you do decide to recreate, I strongly suggest that you do so here, and let me know when you are ready. I hope this helps Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:03, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add that my unblocking of this account was an extension of good faith that you would take the trouble to understand Wikipedia policies and guidelines, and fix up your article submission as you promised, to be in compliance. I note that you have made no edits since I unblocked you, except to request a username change. Now that it is changed, as your next action, I suggest that you follow Jimfbleak's advice above and edit in your sandbox. You may contact him or me to review your work. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:36, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Giraffe Conservation Foundation concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Giraffe Conservation Foundation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:50, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Giraffe Conservation Foundation

Hello Stephinamibia. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Giraffe Conservation Foundation".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Giraffe Conservation Foundation}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 01:01, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]