User talk:Giorgio Il Saggio

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Giorgio Il Saggio (talk • contribs) 20:38, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Giorgo, you can suggest edits at Talk:Dumbo – Thjarkur (talk) 20:50, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Giorgio Il Saggio, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -Jason A. Quest (talk) 03:13, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you add something to Wikipedia, and someone takes it out, the next step is to start a discussion about it. Just adding it again is how you start an edit war, and that is not constructive. Please read some of the introductory material explaining how Wikipedia works. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 23:38, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And if you're going to take something out that's been there for a while, you need to explain why you're removing it. See WP:EDITSUMMARY. Taking out one POV just because it isn't yours is inappropriate. You don't seem to understand (or maybe just don't respect) NPOV, and that's a problem. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 15:23, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That add I removed is mainly focused on Song Of The South and minstrel culture in general and was explained that the crows are not to be considered an example of minstrel, because they are animated animals who perform a jazz performance, not a minstrel performance. It's like considering Cleveland Brown from Family Guy an example of minstrel. And the edits should be mainly centered on the characters and Dumbo. Giorgio Il Saggio (talk) 16:27, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And that add is not there from a while, it was put very recently. Giorgio Il Saggio (talk) 17:01, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't ask you to explain it me, here on your Talk page. I'm asking you to learn how to use Wikipedia. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 19:56, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's becoming increasingly clear that you don't give a damn about how Wikipedia is supposed to work. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 04:04, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 14:35, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

??? Giorgio Il Saggio (talk) 01:47, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]