User talk:Gillweed1995

Welcome!

Hello, Gillweed1995, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. ~~Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as LG Octane, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.~~

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Katarighe (talk) 19:39, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of LG Octane

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on LG Octane requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Katarighe (talk) 19:39, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is a good article but an admin has declined it. Good luck! --Katarighe (talk) 20:07, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to LG The V (VX9800), as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Q ^{T C} 19:48, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Gillweed1995. You have new messages at Katarighe's talk page.
Message added 00:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Katarighe (Talk · Contributions · E-mail) 00:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. jpgordon^{::==( o )} 02:38, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gillweed1995 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My actions were very uncalled for, and I know I totally deserve this. I don't know what I was thinking...but I would greatly appreciate another chance, so taht I could work on LG Octane and LG Cosmos Touch. It would be great if I could finish those articles at least, and it would be ever better if I could have either this account or the account user:Googalyweed1 unlocked for use. Gillweed1995 (talk) 04:23, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm afraid that comments such as this one show clearly that you a) cannot work in a collaborative environment, b) have zero respect for the policies of this privately-owned site, nor the personnel who are here to enforce them. It is precisely that type of behaviour that has led to this very-protective block. Let me add that your very inappropriate use of an alternate account is extremely concerning - that account has been permanently blocked, and additional accounts will be considered evasion of a valid block. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:52, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Gillweed1995 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

98.166.14.193 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Googalyweed1". The reason given for Googalyweed1's block is: "Misbehaving".

Blocking administrator: Killiondude (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: More than one of your accounts has been blocked for sockpuppetry and block evasion. Asking to have the autoblock on your IP address lifted only suggests you intend to continue to create sockpuppets. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:18, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A last chance for such a troll like you? Never in the whole wide world! --Bryce (talk | contribs) 08:19, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, "and it would be ever better if I could have either this account or the account user:Googalyweed1 unlocked for use". So you said before that you had no connection with Googalyweed, but now you are saying that you do have a connection (you admit to that account being yours)? I believe there's no point denying that you lied to get out of trouble. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 08:24, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored my comments in which you attempted to remove. You've been removing everything from your talk ever since you were blocked, even block notices. If this continues your talk page access will be revoked. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 00:10, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, your talk page access will be revoked the next time you attempt to remove block notices from your talk page. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 02:28, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of LG Cosmos Touch

The article LG Cosmos Touch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article about a cell phone that has no indication as to why it is notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GB fan 20:12, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of LG Cosmos Touch for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article LG Cosmos Touch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LG Cosmos Touch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Osarius - Want a chat? 18:55, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]