User talk:Gildo4realdo

Hello! Gil Olive is not the appropriate spot to post information about yourself, because that's the encyclopedic part of the Wikipedia website. User:Gildo4realdo, however, is available for personal information about yourself. Please see Wikipedia:Introduction and Wikipedia:User page for more information. —— Eagle (ask me for help) 04:10, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Petwink2.PNG listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Petwink2.PNG has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it, but use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Thatcher131 04:19, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Petwink

The issue is not whether you are listing the web site for advertising purposes but whether it is Notable and can notability be proved through verifiable sources. For example, has the web site been written about in other pet magazines? Read the guidelines and feel free to recreate the article if you can show that it meets them. Thatcher131 04:22, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Gildo4realdo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

User:Gildo4realdo

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article User:Gildo4realdo, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at [[Talk:User:Gildo4realdo]]. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Calton | Talk 06:37, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Giljenn.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Giljenn.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —MER-C 06:41, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]