User talk:Gilawson

Oleg Alexandrov

A very special message from Oleg Alexandrov. I think we all could learn from it:

Welcome!

Hello, Gilawson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

I replied on my talk page to your query. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:02, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Percent error

Perhaps this should go on the article's talk page, but first of all, percent error is different from approximation error, so they should definitely not be merged or redirected or what have you. And second of all, just having that one source makes the article more "reliable" (in that sense) than a great many articles on here. In my opinion, the tag is extremely nitpicky. You are not going to find, say, an article from a major newspaper on this subject; the source already listed in the article is probably the best you can possibly do. Frankly, tags are ugly, and should be avoided if not absolutely needed. Anyway, glad my impulse at 2 in the morning was not in vain. Loved your post on my talk page, and hopefully some more sources can be found and we can get rid of that tag for good. Have a nice day. →Ed Gl 20:00, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Partial birth Abortion

Hello, you made some changes to partial birth. Watch over the page, will you, add something new and expand on the cruelty. Foremanfan (Forgot to sign)

Sure, I'll watch it. It needs a lot of clean up though and some references, but I'm sure other people are watching it now. Although, I don't necessarily agree with your viewpoints as it seems it is easy to tell which side you are on in the Abortion Debate. So I don't quite understand how I must add to the "cruelty". But thanks for the message and good luck defending your addition to the article Abortion. Gilawson 18:59, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fast reply, good! Some guy wants to remove partial birth, I think he may have some point, so I put it under partial birth section, it should stay there, go on abortiont talk page. Some people just milk un-necessary things to get their point across. You do not have to agree my friend, simply listen and look how ugly partial birth abortion is, cracking baby's skull. Foremanfan

We're not here to "just milk un-necessary things to get (our) point across". We are here to talk facts, not opinion. Gilawson 19:25, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not you, you ok dude,)i guess) I am saying others, milking it for a wrong word somebody says, that is what I say, so do not be like them. Exactly, no opinions, everything I posted happened yesterday, it is a given fact, which now belongs in US and World abortion history and in US it will remain as it is for partial birth abortion. Foremanfan

Yea, I think you should give a look at the two articles: Abortion in the United States and Abortion law as I'm not quite sure how it would play a role in the general article Abortion. It seems that article is the generalized piece about the topic whereas the other articles are more focused on different aspects, which relates to your addition. Gilawson 19:47, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so you mean, I should place my paragraph under partial birth abortion only? Makes sense, but I am not going to argue with others what's right or wrong, but I know a lot on abortion, if they do not want my help, then these articles will miss things of importance. Foremanfan

They seem to be covering that specific topic Here. Gilawson 19:55, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Any other link? Seems fine, all I am saying, few words of current abortion situation is necessary. Would you agree we need separate article on abortion in USA only? 'Foremanfan'

There is already an article about Abortion in the USA, it's Abortion in the United States, and on those pages, there seems to be many many links to other Abortion pages on Wikipedia, so could maybe search among them to see where you could add appropriately. Gilawson 20:10, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I had no idea that article existed, somebody should have told me that in the first place. But anyways, many abortion articles miss tons and tons of information.

Xbox 360

Hi there. Regarding your edits, changing Live to LIVE, note that Wikipedia has its own set of guidelines, specifically Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trademarks), which indicates that Capitalize trademarks, as with proper names. and Follow standard English text formatting and capitalization rules even if the trademark owner encourages special treatment: avoid: REALTOR®, instead, use: Realtor Therefore, we do not care whether the trademark states they should be all capitalized, Wikipedia uses its own guideline which indicates it should be "proper cased". So, LIVE, even as a trademark, must be modified to Live. Hopefully this will help understand the matter. -- ReyBrujo 04:36, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Roger, roger. Gilawson 04:38, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chornobyl

I was surprised by your assertion that "But what I can tell you is that a PWR Generation II doesn't require forced cooling after any type of shutdown to avoid damage" but thought I may be out of date. Since this was contrary to my understanding, I did some research. Specifically I reviewed the "Standard Review Plan for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants: LWR Edition (NUREG-0800)". United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. May 2010. Retrieved 2 June 2010.. Section 5.4.7 titled "RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL (RHR) SYSTEM" (Revision 5 which is dated May 2010) deals with decay heat removal in the residual heat removal (RHR) discussion. It specifically discusses using the reactor coolant system (RCS) during and following shutdown and applies to all currently licensed PWRs and BWRs as well as to any new PWR Generation II license submittals. The reference makes it clear that decay heat removal using active coolant flow is required. Just to make sure I did not misunderstand, I spoke with a gentleman involved in the U.S. NRC licensing review of a recent PWR Generation III reactor license submittal (the Advanced PWR (APWR) - nominally Gen-IV PWR from Mitsubishi Heavy Industries) - he assured me that NO Generation II or III reactor design currently exists that does NOT require active cooling for decay heat removal following a scram after extended full power operation. The original wording which you challenged - "Nuclear power reactors require cooling flow to remove decay heat ... . If not immediately removed by coolant systems, the heat could lead to core damage." - remains correct. Hence I doubt that a reference exists for the assertion that "But what I can tell you is that a PWR Generation II doesn't require forced cooling after any type of shutdown to avoid damage." Therefore I will revert the text to the original form.

Be happy to discuss further if you desire.

Skål - Williamborg (Bill) 18:21, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm back, 10 years later. So yes, nuclear plants don't meltdown when it loses all power. So yes, they are designed to not need forced cooling. There's no RHR when there's no power. So no need to reference RHR. If you are around, we can discuss. Gilawson (talk) 16:52, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Inviting you to WikiAfrica Incubator!

Hey Gilawson,

WikiAfrica invites you to support the Africa Incubator

WikiAfrica is pleased to invite you as a self-declared African Wikipedian to evaluate the Africa Incubator. WikiAfrica has created the Africa Incubator to support and assist new authors, as they create their first articles and learn the ins and outs of contributing to Wikipedia.

The Africa Incubator is a ‘soft landing’ for new authors to develop articles that relate to Africa. It assists them in becoming compliant and knowledgeable of Wikipedia principles and rules. Based within the Wikipedia framework, the Africa Incubator is fully interactive and enables feedback, assistance and forums.

This is where we need your help! For the Africa Incubator to be successful, it needs the intervention, interaction and experience of Incubator Mentors. We are looking for a pool of active experienced Wikipedians to consistently participate in ’owning’ the Africa Incubator. Incubator Mentors will assist new comers through the editing process. They will also help test and expand the Africa Incubator, and will play a vital role in encouraging newcomers to be Wikipedians for life

Please visit WikiAfrica Incubator to give us your honest feedback and evaluation. WikiAfrica is a ground-breaking project that is designed to Africanise Wikipedia by generating and expanding 30,000 articles over two years. Find out more about this project here WikiAfrica. To get involved, contact Francis [wikipedian@wikiafrica.net] Twitter: twitter.com/#!/wikiafrica Facebook: www.facebook.com/WikiAfrica

--Awinda 10:59, 6 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Awinda (talk • contribs)

Call for Wikipedians in Residence in Africa

Hello,

I hope you are well and thriving!! WikiAfrica has just put out a call for two Wikipedians in Residence. One in Cape Town at WikiAfrica, at the Africa Centre; and the other for WikiAfrica Cameroon in Douala, at doual’art. If you are interested, please contact either Marilyn [marilyn.doualabelldoualart.org] for the WikiAfrica Cameroon call or Isla [islahfafricacentre.net] for the WikiAfrica position in Cape Town.

If you are not interested in applying, I would be very grateful if you could spread this call far and wide among your networks to ensure that both projects get excellent candidates. Here is the link for the information page: http://www.wikiafrica.net/two-wikipedians-in-residence-for-africa/

Best regards, Islahaddow

(This message was sent using Lucia Bot at 22:20, 16 November 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Fire Service

Hello and good afternoon (at least it is afternoon where I am). I was looking at the Wikipedian firefighters category and noticed that you are one of the members of the Wikipedia community that lists yourself as being a firefighter. First and foremost let me say thank you for your service. While I myself am not a firefighter, I do work as a photographer with multiple local fire departments. I am honored to have firefighters as some of my closest friends.

I have been taking an active role in the Fire Service WikiProject and am trying to recruit more members to this cause. If this is something you have any interest in, please let me know? You can leave me a message on my talk page. Obviously there is zero obligation. An interest can be anything from helping out with a couple of pages in your local area to helping to overhaul major templates, and anything in between.

Once again, thank you for your service. Hope to hear from you soon. Stay safe! --Zackmann08 (talk) 17:52, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]