User talk:GiantSquidAttack

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Longview, Washington, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. did you know that giant squid are the favorite food of sperm whales? they also love to eat sockpuppets ! WuhWuzDat 03:27, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grant Avalon, you may be blocked from editing. WuhWuzDat 03:29, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Longview, Washington, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Drmies (talk) 03:30, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please excuse my inexperience. I have not intentionally vandalized any pages. The page of Grant Avalon was simply because I did not know how else to answer Grant's pleas to change his fate, which I might add had not a shred of justice in it. I am a resident of Longview, and if you would actually look at my revisions, you would see that I made needed revisions, not vandalism in the slightest.

What do you believe "compromising integrity" means? I can assure you that my edits do not compromise the integrity of this website, not at least by most people's definitions.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GiantSquidAttack (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Perhaps whomever blocked me should allow me to defend myself. As they say in law, innocent until proven guilty, and I am certain no one has proven anything.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 04:35, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GiantSquidAttack (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If you look at my contributions, nearly all of my edits were simply revisions, not at all harmful. I understand that I am suspected for wrongdoing, but it is clear that I am only trying to improve Wikipedia, especially the page of my hometown, Longview, Washington. I will not vandalize anymore, especially due to the fact that I have a better grasp on what is proper on this website.

Decline reason:

You have misunderstood the exact reason you are blocked. You are blocked for violating our policy on abuse of multiple accounts. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Welshdave86/Archive. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:41, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.