User talk:Ghtyerdfsdwre

Welcome from Kukini

Hello, Ghtyerdfsdwre, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few more good links to help you get started:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 17:23, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Vandalism page

You are more than welcome to use it on your page. Have fun. --Pilotguy^{(roger that)} 00:18, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :-) -- David 00:19, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Hi, David - just wanted to let you know that I think your user page got vandalized, in case you want to update your counter. See you around! - Tapir Terrific 17:32, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! It sucks - the one day i'm away from my PC all hell breaks out! :-) --David C 15:49, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Major18

Comley stop accusing me of being a vandly, Pak21's username is clearly racist and therefore i believe that he should be blocked. As im sure you are aware pak is the abriviation of a commonly used racist term for people of Asion or Pakistani origin. Please look in the dictionary if you don't understand (and see if you can find any good words to describe yourself). I will not tollerate racism on wikipedia and you being a socilist/communist/%*"*er should not either. --Major18 14:22, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Did you not like my style for your homepage? --Major18 14:25, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P.P.S. I can see a resemblance between you and the picture, your both big headed. (Both of you have heads double the size of your body)--Major18 15:10, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- Number 1, who are you to judge Pak21 simply because of a username which you have interpreted to be racist? If you are looking for a conclusive answer I suggest you ask him/her directly. Secondly, this feud is not constructive and does not benefit the encyclopaedia. I would appreciate it if you were to remove my name from your list of so called 'vandals' on your talk page, and perhaps read the recently posted warning before denying it yourself! --David 15:28, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I know about their accusations (and those of Mechanismtongs as well). I've had the username "pak21" on various systems since 1995, so I'm not going to let it worry me, though :-) Cheers --Pak21 15:50, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- Thanks, just out of interest, why did you restore major18's comment when I tried to delete it? If its wiki policy could u give me the details for future reference? --David 16:03, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see [1], you may wish to comment there. Thanks Pilotguy^{(roger that)} 18:00, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mechanismtongs

(in response to a post by Mechanismtongs)

PAK is also the Dutch term for a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon and probably a lot more. I would allow the name unless he shows particular interest in articles about people and countries he's supposed to be racist towards (which I haven't checked). Do you have any evidence apart from the name that this is the case? - Mgm|^(talk) 14:15, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- I think there has been a misunderstanding. I presume the comment which i deleteted earlier today was unsigned, and if you will check this page's history you will see that it was posted by User:Mechanismtongs [2]. Over the last few weeks i have been having a number of problems with this user regarding vandalism etc, and this is not the first time he has tried to have a go at Pak21. My response to the comment is posted on this page, but if i can find his original statement i will post it here :-)

Someone deleted my comment. Isnt that an act of vandalism? Shouldnt that person be blocked? I would NOT delete someonen elses comments, so is it unfair to do so to me?

Please reply asap --Mechanismtongs 15:32, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SOZ that was me forgot to login

- With paks username the only reason i am suspicious is that if u put pak in google it is assumed as the racist term "paki". He also did not deny it on my talk page that his username was racially spiteful--Mechanismtongs 15:35, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- - I understand your concern, but you question has already been answered on this page and there's no reason to start labelling people as racists. The comment I removed could easily be classified as a personal attack. The encyclopaedia would probably benefit more from constructive editing than unwarranted abuse towards other users. --David Comley 15:49, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Cam de Leon; Hook Flash; Emirates Towers Hotel; Sydney Tower; Menara Telekom; Bondage hook; Supertall; Emirates Office Tower; Ewen Macintosh; Anthology of Interest I; Al Burj; Shun Hing Square; Eureka Tower; Baiyoke Tower II; Central Plaza, Hong Kong; Millennium Tower (Hong Kong); Shard London Bridge; Social aspects of clothing; Borj-e Milad

Cleanup: Shirk (polytheism); Trash-talk; Funckarma
Merge: Christian theology; Cartridge (firearms); Environmentalism
Add Sources: Democratic Party; Abdullah AbdulRahman; Chemical Weapons Convention
Wikify: City Hall and City Duma; Ebolaworld; Paulinho Da Costa
Expand: St. Louis rappers; Quantock Hills; Main characters of Xenogears

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 13:00, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thank you

thanks for clearing it up hope fully their arguments with you will not spill over to us and just a suggestion but it is aginst wikipedia rules to mention real names. thanks--Hunter91 19:36, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Duly noted, i'll remove them. But honestly they're not fooling anyone - they're the ones sockpuppeting! --David C 19:41, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

dont worry already removed them and i was not having a dig or anything just letting you know because they would try to use it aginst you. --Hunter91 19:47, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know, thanks again --David C 19:49, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Out of interest is majour18 the same person as general omerof --Hunter91 19:51, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We can run a sockpuppet check but i think i can safetly say it is --David C 19:55, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rubbish i promise it aint me. I apologise for any inconvience cause--General Oumrov 21:29, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Monty Python TfD compromise

There is a compromise now posted on the TfD if you are still interested in this debate. One question, even though you are against this TfD, have you even taken the master template out for a test drive?
Lady Aleena talk/contribs 08:43, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Boris Johnson VC has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

Yay

Thanks for the Christmas message...i like Christmas, its fun!!! Just i don't like the religious side of it!--Boris Johnson VC 10:45, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:South park1.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:South park1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — MECU≈talk 01:57, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You might need to reload/refresh the page as it is cached in your browser. You could also try purging the page. --MECU≈talk 20:13, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Boston you say?

Saw your user page & saw that you like Boston. Was just wondering if your favorite song was More Than a Feeling, as it is mine... Cheers, Spawn Man 08:38, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ghtyerdfsdwre. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]