User talk:Ghostofthelandscape

Ghostofthelandscape, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ghostofthelandscape! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 20:31, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Adam Marshall". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 30 July 2014.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 08:12, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Adam Marshall, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, Sunray (talk) 18:46, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Adam Marshall

Nope! The version that is there gets across all the key facts without creating an undue weight issue. The version that you want to adds nothing significant to the article apart from comments from various people that it was bad (which is completely self-evident), and serves no other purpose than to pad out the focus on this issue in this article. For that kind of detail to be appropriate, you'd have to expand the rest of the article by a good 200-300%.

This said, I'm not opposed to extending what's there if there is sufficiently good reason, it's sufficiently well-sourced, and it's not over-egged - i.e. the Daily Telegraph expose on his driving record, which was clearly significant, and the summary of the article on Wikipedia stuck to key facts, so I added that section back in.

Calling it a continuing scandal is a bit much. There are zero Google News hits on this issue in the last three weeks, since the last of the regional newspapers caught up with his conviction, and lots of coverage about Marshall doing a whole bunch of other things - in fact, the press seems to be much more concerned with his support for medical marijuana since then. The Drover's Wife (talk) 04:55, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]