User talk:Ghettoshark

Titletown USA

If you wish to have a ESPN page dealing with their Titletown USA program then create a page specific for ESPN. Titletown USA is a trademarked name for the city of Green Bay, WI and therefor such a title in Wikipedia will be used exclusively for Green Bay, WI. Any variation of the name will also be used for Green Bay, WI. Such a page for ESPN's segment should include ESPN in the title.

Okay, I was confused because you changed the Titletown USA from a copy of the Green Bay, WI page to a redirect...where I had origingally changed it from ESPN's Titletown page to the Green Bay page...okay we are on the same page then. I'm a Pats fan and thus aren't a huge packers fan (stemming from the superbowl in the 90's) but i'm a purist and believe ESPN's segment was a total mockery.

Your opinion regarding the relevancy of the ESPN Titletown USA title should be relegated to it's own page. Inserting this into the Valdosta page is not germane. The fact remains that Valdosta won this particular contest. Whether or not you believe it's bogus is a matter of opinion and phrasing this as "despite the fact..." is implicitly judgmental, IMO. Perhaps it would be better to say that Valdosta won the "ESPN Titletown USA", but your version is not appropriate for this section. My revisions were not "vandalism" and I don't appreciate the threat to ban.69.134.127.3 (talk) 04:39, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are not the sole decisionmaker on this matter. See Wikipedia:Ownership of articles. It appears to me that you are trying to stir up controversy. After the contest was over, several people were editing the Titletown USA redirects, and you are the one that kept reverting. I believe you violated the spirit of the 3 revert rule, if not committed a letter violation as well. Wikipedia is about consensus, and your belief that Green Bay should have the redirect when the American people voted that they believe another city is TitleTown USA does not control. No consensus was reached on Wikipedia, but I was happy with the settlement of the disambig page that somebody else put up. You reverted multiple people and your version has lasted because nobody else cares enough to get into an edit war with you about it, nor do we want to intentionally violate the 3 revert rule. The trademark issue is a valid point in debate, but we don't redirect every version of 12th man to Texas A & M University, even though they own the trademark. It's not worth it to me to get into an edit war. Keep it how you want, but your warning on my page was absolutely rediculous when you were the one editing in a manner inconsistent with wikipedia policy. Don't threaten me with a ban when you are the one that broke established policy. 76.97.92.240 (talk) 13:30, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Further to this please do misuse vandalism templates to push your point-of-view. They should be used for instances of vandalism, not because someone disagrees with your opinion. I did not appreciate being called a vandal either. Also whether a term is supposedly trademarked is irrelevant. You may wish to read trademark and trademark distinctiveness to understand why. Hippo (talk) 00:17, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia

Welcome!

Hello, Ghettoshark, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Gman124^talk 16:10, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please…

…no personal attacks, even if they may seem justified.^[1] We're pretty picky about this; please look at:

--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:05, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Ghettoshark! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 49 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Pat Julmiste - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:39, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pat Julmiste

The article Pat Julmiste has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

What is asserted is no notable: no professional career.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 00:15, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]