User talk:Ghazi Malik

This is Ghazi Malik's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2020 Syrian parliamentary election has been accepted

2020 Syrian parliamentary election, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 02:02, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ghazi Malik, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ghazi Malik! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:10, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ottoman Empire has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ottoman Empire was changed by Ghazi Malik (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.878925 on 2020-07-22T21:17:02+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:17, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ottoman Empire

Why did you blank most of the article? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:15, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: Hello there. This was an accident when using the 'undo' button. This also occurred when editing a draft article I created, Ali Keda. In both instances, pressing 'undo' to undo the undo did not work. I sincerely apologize for the inconvenience. Ghazi Malik (talk) 16:14, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ottoman Empire; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:20, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Al-Salt bin Malik has been accepted

Al-Salt bin Malik, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 17:59, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ali Keda has been accepted

Ali Keda, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 06:46, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
9	Ibn Wahb (talk)	Add sources
71	Al-Waqidi (talk)	Add sources
1,543	Ankara (talk)	Add sources
21	Qays ibn Sa'd (talk)	Add sources
43	Independence Day (Myanmar) (talk)	Add sources
675	Abu Hanifa (talk)	Add sources
292	Kufa (talk)	Cleanup
54	Siege of Famagusta (talk)	Cleanup
28	Independence Day (Algeria) (talk)	Cleanup
65	Dyula language (talk)	Expand
10	Giritli Ali Aziz Efendi (talk)	Expand
673	Muhammad al-Bukhari (talk)	Expand
333	Syrian opposition (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
360	History of Istanbul (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
257	Kingdom of Mutapa (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
540	Tawaf (talk)	Merge
171	Arabic calligraphy (talk)	Merge
3,324	Teej (talk)	Merge
221	Shia view of Ali (talk)	Wikify
100	Jami` at-Tirmidhi (talk)	Wikify
4	2017 Ebrahim Raisi presidential campaign (talk)	Wikify
2	Muhammad ibn Nur (talk)	Orphan
3	Jamal ibn Abd Allah Shaykh Umar (talk)	Orphan
17	Ottoman Exile (talk)	Orphan
36	Mahfuz Omar (talk)	Stub
15	Hammad ibn Salamah (talk)	Stub
25	Abd al-Rahman al-Awza'i (talk)	Stub
8	Sirius College (talk)	Stub
14	Harald Motzki (talk)	Stub
2	Ibn Manzar (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:40, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies!

Hi, I am sorry for reverting your edit on Ibn Karram. I think you misunderstood the meaning of the "hellfire preacher". This is why I have created an article that clarifies this topic. Anyway, take care and happy editing!--TheEagle107 (talk) 18:38, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@TheEagle107: No worries! Ghazi Malik (talk) 10:49, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Caesar (Syrian military defector)

Hello, Ghazi Malik. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Caesar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:26, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

This is Stephennie Mulder - I just noticed you started this article on the Timurid Qur'an, and Yael Rice and I wanted to send you a kitten to say thanks. We really appreciate this! :-) Have a lovely day! Stephennie

ArtsOfIslam (talk) 23:50, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Caesar (Syrian military defector)

Hello, Ghazi Malik. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Caesar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:13, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Task force

Hello, care to join us in Wikipedia Muslim history task force to improve the quality of articles regarding Histories of Islam? Ahendra (talk) 13:46, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Islamic Barnstar

		The Islamic Barnstar Award
		for you for Major contributions in Wikiproject Islam Ahendra (talk) 12:50, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Awni El-Dous

Hey man, I noticed that you reverted that guy who vandalised the page, thanks for that. I also noticed looking through your contributions and at the guy who you reverted that you hadn't given a notice to them when you reverted that vandalism. This is a helpful way to notify other editors that someone has been warned for something similar in the past.

While you can use the page I linked above to manually apply notices, you can also use a helpful program called Twinkle. Twinkle has a lot of neat functions in one, such as warning, welcoming, reverting for both good and bad faith and quicker ways to escalate incidents, while also having more page related goodies like tagging pages with maintenance templates, requesting protection for pages or speedy deletion/other deletion methods. It's well worth looking into if you're interested. CommissarDoggo^Talk? 11:36, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]