User talk:Ghanika

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Annapurna Studios . Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:51, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Balaji Motion Pictures. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Arjayay (talk) 07:40, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ghanika, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Arumanketki (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 07:58, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

I've blocked your sockpuppet account, any further inappropriate edits from you or another sockpuppet and your editing privileges will be withdrawn completely. —SpacemanSpiff 08:16, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ek Ruka Hua Faisla has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ek Ruka Hua Faisla was changed by Ghanika (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.932479 on 2016-06-22T13:06:17+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:06, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cinema of India may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Film|Academy Award for Best Foreign Language]] on eight occasions, next only to Hindi.<ref>[[http://bhoothnike.com/movie-database/indias-oscar-failures-25-movie-images/,Indian moies ],[[title=

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:52, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cinema of India may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

com/movie-database/indias-oscar-failures-25-movie-images/,Indian movies ]|publisher=Bhoothnike.com] |accessdate=24 Jun 2016.</ref> Mani Ratnam's ''[[Nayakan (1987 film)|Nayagan]]'' (1987) was

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:09, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Ek Ruka Hua Faisla. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. - Arjayay (talk) 14:29, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]