User talk:Gggtt
Gggtt, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Gggtt! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 26 December 2016 (UTC) |
I found Evola first at...
[edit]...http://www.nybooks.com/articles/1995/06/22/ur-fascism/ by the excellent Umberto Eco.
Enjoy.
David Lloyd-Jones (talk) 10:40, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- @David Lloyd-Jones:, Evola apparently advocated rape as a part of his sexual magic views:
- "Evola was not just a theoretician, he also practiced sexual magic rites himself. There are unmistakable statements from him about the “tantric female sacrifice” and the transformation of sexuality into political power. Like almost no other, the Italian has openly named the events that unfold in the mysteries of the yogis and then confessed to them: “The young woman,” he writes, “who is first ‘demonized’ and then raped, ... is essentially... the basic motif for the higher forms of tantric and Vajrayanic sexual magic” (Evola, 1983, p. 389). In dictators like Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini he saw the precursors of future Maha Siddhas who would one day conquer the world with their magic powers: “The magician, the ruler, the lord”, he proclaims in regard to Tantrism, “that is the type of the culture of the future!” (Evola, 1926, p. 304). He recommends Tantrism as “the way for a Western elite” (Evola, East and West, p. 29)."[1]Gggtt (talk) 07:08, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Nice folks.
- Last I heard of Tantric Elitism was Steve Gaskin maundering on endlessly at the Family Dog on the Great High Way. Of Highway. Your call.
- David Lloyd-Jones (talk) 19:11, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Image source problem with File:Possessed review.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Possessed review.jpg.
This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.
If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:11, 7 April 2017 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 04:11, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
