User talk:Gfxseries

Ceno (rapper) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ceno (rapper), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paul W (talk) 16:33, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Paul W well for now, i will all independent sources for it so that it could me more reliable than other inforgraphic links. Gfxseries (talk) 16:51, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Paul W kindly check as i have added citation and much more reliable data for it and help me to move this article to article space. Gfxseries (talk) 18:32, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ceno (rapper) (June 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ceno (rapper) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ceno (rapper), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:35, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gfxseries! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:35, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae yes i would like to continue to add citation again Gfxseries (talk) 18:37, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae can you mention portion that show the citation are not reliable. Gfxseries (talk) 18:38, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae kindly check i have done modification Gfxseries (talk) 18:56, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, there are 0 reliable sources and you're editing on behalf of a banned/blocked editor. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:58, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

let me check blocked? Gfxseries (talk) 19:03, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The owner of the company you are hired by is not permitted to edit Wikipedia. I suggest you and he give the money back to your client as there is 0 chance of him getting an article since he isn't notable and doesn't appear to have been advised that Wikipedia actually has inclusion standards. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:05, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removing the required disclosure is a great way to get blocked and won't change what I'm telling you. Your choice, ultimately. Disclosure is required by policy. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:06, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Ceno (rapper)

Draft:Ceno (rapper), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Ceno (rapper) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Ceno (rapper) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:15, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

what a great way of helping new user. Gfxseries (talk) 19:16, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you probably shouldn't be taking money to edit on Wikipedia when you don't have any experience or a clue what you're doing and expect volunteer (read: unpaid) editors to do the work for you. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:17, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ceno (rapper) (June 20)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by FormalDude was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This draft has been Rejected by a reviewer in the Articles for Creation review process. This means the topic is entirely unsuitable for its own article on Wikipedia. DO NOT resubmit this draft, or attempt to resubmit this draft, or prepare or submit a draft that is substantially the same as this draft without discussing the reasons for the rejection. You may request a discussion with the rejecting reviewer (FormalDude (talk · contribs)), or you may request a discussion with the community at the Teahouse. A discussion will not necessarily agree to a resubmission. If this draft is resubmitted, or an attempt is made to resubmit this draft or an equivalent draft, without addressing the reasons for the Rejection, a topic-ban or a partial block may be requested against the submitting editor, and the draft may be nominated for deletion.

––FormalDude talk 19:16, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

what kind of citation you are looking as i have provided news evidence and many more but why if this is case with me then why other articles with no information are approved. Let me know specifically reason for this. Gfxseries (talk) 19:20, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please share with me what other articles with no information are approved. ––FormalDude talk 19:20, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_(American_rapper) check this and i have huge list while learning how to best draft on wikipedia if that can be published then why is case with me as i am providing well enough information. Gfxseries (talk) 19:26, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're not providing good enough information though. The only source is a press release. ––FormalDude talk 19:35, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 02:35, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MER-C

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gfxseries (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ceno Article Is Need To Draft With Citation and am Trying To Do That As This is not a promotion or something like that and am trying to convince the article with notibilty Gfxseries (talk) 05:35, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since you don't think that you were promoting, even though you were, there are no grounds to remove the block. Please read WP:COI and WP:PAID. You also do not address your proxying for a blocked user. 331dot (talk) 09:11, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.