User talk:Gforcepakistan4

November 2014

Hello, I'm SURIV. I noticed that you made a change to an article, G Force Pakistan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —suriv (talk) 16:37, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm SURIV. I noticed that you made a change to an article, G Force Pakistan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —suriv (talk) 01:32, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at G Force Pakistan. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —suriv (talk) 02:42, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to G Force Pakistan. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —suriv (talk) 16:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of G Force Pakistan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article G Force Pakistan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G Force Pakistan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —suriv (talk) 19:23, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with G Force Pakistan. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 03:01, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at G Force Pakistan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:05, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gforce Pakistan

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding bribery attempt. The thread is Bribery but not enough.The discussion is about the topic G Force Pakistan. Thank you. —CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:08, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 17:15, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic User:Gforcepakistan4. Thank you. Gabriel Turner (talk) 23:46, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]