User talk:Getonyourfeet

Welcome!

Hello, Getonyourfeet, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! -SpuriousQ 07:59, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Free Software

Greetings, Getonyourfeet, I notice that you're interested in open-source/free software. Please consider joining WikiProject Free Software. We're just starting out, and we could really use some members. Thanks! Geekman314^{(contact me)} 14:39, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lei

Hi. Just letting you know I saw your message on Lei (Hawaii). Do you have any interest in joining WPHawaii? We need editors like yourself who have a good critical view, and are willing to tag articles and add comments. We are also missing important articles like Filipino_immigration_to_Hawaii. Let me know if you are able to help out in any other way. —Viriditas | Talk 01:28, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Check

Which article? Rich Farmbrough, 18:48 11 April 2007 (GMT).

Thanks, there were several of these, but the cause of the problem is fixed. Rich Farmbrough, 18:59 11 April 2007 (GMT).

From the template page: "There is currently no consensus about where to place this template; most suggest either the bottom of the article page (in an empty 'References' section), or on the article's talk page." At the top of the page isn't mentioned. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 22:21, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So it doesn't really matter... "most suggest..." not mandatory... oh well i was just going with the customs... usually i see this at the top. lawl... something new for meeeeee to know i guess...thx for pointing it outGetonyourfeet 22:28, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks so much for fixing the Technical section of Comparison of portable media players. I appreciate it! --Jw21 aka PenaltyKillah^talk 02:30, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dates

Please don't do this: April 7th — it overrides user preferences. See Wikipedia:Dates. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 20:24, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I don't follow (WP:MoS) I frankly don't have time to read the whole guide... MoS nazis and WP:Wikignomes can do this work so they can clean up my mistakes on spot... and in eventuality all edits will converge to perfection given time... I am not familiar all the minutia and rules of the MoS guide book. In Wikipedia, it says they are guidelines that "attempts to encourage consistency and ease of reading" ... "one way is often as good as another, but if everyone does it the same way, Wikipedia will be easier to read, write and edit." If you have objections to my edits, please do them directly... otherwise I get scared and take them personal as am I feeling right now...*shiverz* post here if you have major problems! do not post here if you have minor problems! To me, I was trying to be consistent and provide easy access for people who want to look up the date on click. Getonyourfeet 20:55, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John Flower (Cleric)

Copyvio? You're working too quickly. Read the sources. Its a cut and paste from a PDomain source. Bit slower? Victuallers 14:42, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

reliable sources on "Ney wiki"

I don't understand why you classified kitetoa.com as non reliable sources and leave all sources coming from JP Ney website wich could be classified as Self-published sources.

btw Kitetoa is he pretty good source of information on the french web, owned by a french journalist ( not me ). Winning trials and a Voltaire prize on the Big Brother Award for his work to defend the free of speach on internet in France [1]. Kiteoa is also now one of the organizer of BBA in France [2]

quite more reliable than most of all others sources quoted on the Ney page —Preceding unsigned comment added by Castelmore (talk • contribs) 18:36, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for support keeping MaNGOS

Here is my deletion review I activated here. My last try anyway. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review#MaNGOS —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lielei (talk • contribs) 14:18, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Computing Minimalism

Getonyourfeet, thanks so much for cleaning up the article on computing minimalism, it looks really great. Just last night I added it to my watchlist with the hopes of cleaning it up at some point and you beat me to it. Great work indeed, thanks again.--Vince | Talk 07:35, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Userboxes show up huge in Firefox

Hi, Getonyourfeet, from same wikipedia talk pages where you commented, I understand that you are working with userboxes and firefox. I also use this combination, but for some reasons, I can't put my finger on a the reason why my the texts in userboxes show up huge: see here. Would you know what is wrong? Wim van Dorst (Talk) 21:09, 23 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]

AfD nomination of Jean-Paul Ney

An editor has nominated Jean-Paul Ney, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean-Paul Ney and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:59, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Leykis

I made some edits to Tom Leykis. Please feel free to check 'em out. Tonessuit (talk) 03:24, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Taho: Sound byte

Ah I can't get you a free one, but if your curious still to how its said Listen to this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3PUsMFUWFo&NR=1 the lady at 0:04 says it with the same infliction as a vendor would. -- 129.94.30.7 (talk) 08:35, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Zune preloaded content

The article List of Zune preloaded content has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable subject matter, violates WP:NOT#IINFO, and according to the talk page comment "I like how we at Wikipedia are the only ones to have to Halo Zune content listed, including Zune themselves" likely unsourceable original research.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sandstein 16:10, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brain Fuck Scheduler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Pugh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]