User talk:Getoar/Archive1

Template:AlbanianPMs

How do you like this? Do look for mistakes and other ways of improvement - especially, let's try extending it back to 1912 (the 1910s are a rather murky period of Albanian history, which is why I shied away from the task myself).
Also, I should caution against having Socialist People's Republic of Albania as an article distinct from History of Communist Albania, because that risks creating a content fork. Right now, all the content in the first article can safely be merged into the second. Biruitorul 00:18, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. Glad to hear it, and good work. Biruitorul 18:32, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just one question, though. I originally noted Hoxha assumed office in 1946 so as to avoid confusion, given that Albania became communist in 1944. Did Albania have a prime minister in 1944-46? If not, then I would suggest restoring that note, or turning it into a footnote. Biruitorul 18:38, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, OK. Then that's settled. My other question was about Myfit Libohova - he appears on the main list but not on our template. How come? Biruitorul 18:46, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the explanation. On Kosovo/Kosova: well, you're right that we Romanians have closer ties to you Albanians than to the Slavic peoples, and I appreciate and value those ties, both linguistic and ethnic. However, we are also very close to our Orthodox brothers the Serbs and have been so throughout our history, so that is a special case. I don't like Milošević and I think what he did there was terrible (even if some of the reports of genocide were inflated by NATO propaganda). I also think Albanians, forming the great majority of the population, should have some say in running the province. Nevertheless, it holds -- and let us not forget its full name, Kosovo i Metohija, which reminds us of the plentiful monastic lands once owned by the Serbian Orthodox Church before the vehemently anti-Serbian Tito seized them and opened them to Albanian settlement -- a vitally important place in the Serbian consciousness, going back to 1389 and beyond. While the Milošević regime could not be trusted to rule over Albanians, I believe today's Serbian government, fragile though it is, is in a much better position to do so. Let us also not forget the position of the remaining Serbs there, who already live in a state of siege and would doubtless be forced to flee in the event of independence. Many of their ancient monasteries have already been laid waste, and while I could in theory foresee some legitimate methods of gaining independence, I do not believe the international community should be influenced by the violence already unleashed, and the threat of further violence, led by former members of the KLA, itself deeply connected with drug and terrorism networks. Anyway, most of what I know about Kosovo comes from Serbs, but if you think I'm misstating the case, I welcome an Albanian view. Biruitorul 00:53, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fejzi Bej Alizoti

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Fejzi Bej Alizoti, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.teachersparadise.com/ency/en/wikipedia/f/fe/fejzi_alizoti.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 05:17, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Nuages

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Nuages, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Nuages seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Nuages, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 23:32, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I see you're still not archiving your talk page. ;) Cheers. --PaxEquilibrium 20:46, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Nuages

A tag has been placed on Nuages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- WebHamster 01:35, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT REMOVE THEM!

Hi, if you have a problem with a speedy deletion request on a page that you have created, please do not remove it yourslef, please follow the instructions in the red box. Aflumpire (talk) 20:27, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You AGAIN ignored my warning by removing the speedy deletion request. I know that you have done that from the first edit you made after my re instatement of the warning. The article is now good enough, but next time, you will be officialy warned. DO NOT do this again. This is last friendly warning. Aflumpire (talk) 21:36, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Pjeter Bogdani banknote.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pjeter Bogdani banknote.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:01, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Fatmir Sejdiu.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fatmir Sejdiu.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

invitation to WikiProject Kosovo

Hi
I see that you have contributed a lot on kosovo related articles , so I think you might be interested in joinig the Kosovo WikiProject -- B.C. 18:02, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thaddeus (Family Guy)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Thaddeus (Family Guy), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Thaddeus (Family Guy). Redfarmer (talk) 01:37, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should see this

I think you should take a look at Adem Jashari , some users have completely f****d up the article
We should do something about this --B.C ^{say what ?} 20:33, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing it , as for the "why do we have to speak english" ,this is the english wikipedia but you can make a comment in albanian in my talk page , I dont think that will matter much as I will understand it either way , plus : "të parët tanë na lanë këtë gjuhë , apo jo ? :-) --B.C ^{say what ?} 12:27, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Lovro Mihačević

A tag has been placed on Lovro Mihačević requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 9Nak (talk) 06:12, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(replying to message on my talk page) - Please don't be discouraged. Try using your userpage to work on the article, get a couple paragraphs done (enough to establish notability), and then re-add it. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 06:19, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Kosovo

Before making further edits to Kosovo, please take part in discussion of changes on the article's talk page as the article is sure to be contentious right now. The best way to ensure changes stick and we do not start an edit war is to come up with consensus on the talk page. Thanks, SorryGuy Talk 00:29, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Fatmir Sejdiu.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Fatmir Sejdiu.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:20, 18 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Superm401 - Talk 03:20, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make unconstructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits appears to be constructive and has been smiled about or lauded. Please use every article for any great edits you would like to make, and take a look at the page for cool editors to learn more about contributing awesomely to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Colleenthegreat (talk) 06:21, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Urime Kosovës

Plako, urime Kosovës!Ta gëzojmë pavarësin e saj.--Taulant23 (talk) 06:22, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Patjetër që do ta ndryshojmë,por tani me duket si shpejt.Sa te kaloj pak koha(se do kemi shume war-edit,dhe edi vete ti do fillojme ta rregullojme me shume.Me kujdes gjithmone dhe me gjakftohtesi qe te krijojme nje opinion te mire dhe te mos bllokohemi kot.--Taulant23 (talk) 06:28, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

) Sa do lija nje mesazh tek talk-page.Hey mos ki merak se tani qe shpalli dhe pavaresine Kosova dhe ne te Wiki do ta kemi me te lehte ta rregullojme.--Taulant23 (talk) 06:38, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey lale do e heqësh atë historine ne fillim te serve,e di sec care them besoj.Duhet ta pastrojme fillimin.--Taulant23 (talk) 06:54, 18 February 2008 (UTC) Hey plako, ça po i bejme? :) Kush e mendonte se do vinte kjo ditë qe ta therasim Kosoven tone republike te pavarur.Care dite e shenuar,sa me fat jemi qe po e jetojme kete dite--Taulant23 (talk) 07:41, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ska problem me lal,rendesi ka Kosova e lire,populli i saj te ndihet i lire,se ne fundja kemi nje indetitet,jemi shqipetar.Nga nje ane me mire bejne qe se ngaterrojne shume RSH pasi e di ti Serbet si jane.Ja ngjisin pullen Shqiperia e madhe dhe kush rri ja shpjegone historine Evropes dhe Amerikes.--Taulant23 (talk) 07:51, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pristina / Prishtina / Priština

Please do not move pages if there is no discussion, let alone consensus, to do so. We may discuss, but overtly bold moves tend to only cause edit-warring. Thanks. —Kurykh 08:50, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names) before further responding to the issue. Thanks. —Kurykh 08:51, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Common in English, not Albanian. This is the English Wikipedia. In English, "Pristina" is used, admittedly for reasons unknown. What people in Pristina/Prishtina use is irrelevant for article titles, only in article intro. —Kurykh 08:55, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You still seem confused. I keep talking about common English usage, and you give me official government usage. The former takes precedence on the English Wikipedia. —Kurykh 08:59, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About Iran, I say that incidents regarding Iran before the name change should use the name Persia, and everything after, Iran. Whether Wikipedia usage reflects that I do not know, as I am not into Iranian/Persian topics. But perhaps someone more fitting and appropriate is the Danzig/Gdansk naming convention that is now pretty much the binding precedent on Wikipedia. —Kurykh 09:02, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For one thing, newspapers do not dictate common usage. However, I agree with your main premise: when common usage shifts in favor of Prishtina, we will then change it to reflect that. Until then, Pristina holds. —Kurykh 09:04, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have no opinion on whether or when it will shift, as I am neither Albanian nor Serbian (I'm actually Chinese). But when common English usage does indeed shift decisively to Prishtina, then you can count on my support for the change. —Kurykh 09:07, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jakup Krasniqi

A tag has been placed on Jakup Krasniqi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ClanCC _{(_T / ^C)} 09:29, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

Please acquaint yourself with WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. I'm perfectly entitled to having opinions witout you directing personal attacks at me. Comment on content and not on persons. Further abuse will be reported. JdeJ (talk) 09:30, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo

Hi, and thanks for your edits to Kosovo. However, you reverted back some 30 revisions a moment ago. I see that perhaps some of the removed stuff should be reinserted, but you also reverted a lot of valid edits in the process, and you really shouldn't. Please feel free to edit the page and reinsert uncontroversial stuff, but don't remove others' valid edits. Thanks. Lilac Soul ^{(talk • contribs • count)} 12:37, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

change the article name of Prishtina

Hey , thought you may want to see this
There's a survey going on on whether the name of the Prishtina article should be canged from the serbian one to the english one
Please vote here
Thanks --Cradel 13:01, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dardani

Check the article on Dardani and its sources.... And, stop promoting the Albanian POV. Heracletus (talk) 01:24, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, there is not... You don't even understand what the term "Thrco-Illyrian" means... And, I will stop assuming good faith if you tamper with articles written before the 2008 Kosovo UDI... All your sources seem to be based on Albanian POV... You even made Kosovo a country on the lead, while the consensus was on it being a "region under dispute" Heracletus (talk) 01:29, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding reversions[1] made on February 19 2008 to Kosovo

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Kurykh 06:07, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since Kosovo is under an article parole and revert warring on that page at this time is particularly disruptive, I've blocked you for 48h. This is also because of your disruptive messing around with the Pristina article and your overall combative attitude, evidenced also in your latest postings to Kurykh. I'm also putting you on notice that you may be placed under a long-term revert limitations under WP:ARBMAC if problems continue. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:53, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:BamirTopi.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:BamirTopi.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 02:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the reason you reverted my minor change about ottoman period?

I believe I have better information on this era than the person who wrote the previous edition?

I will edit a new section about the turks in Kosova, however the minor change was about the subjective comments about the reasons of Kosovar muslim conversion. Please look at my minor edit one more time. thanks

As a half shiptar from my mother side who escaped from Serbian-Russian army in 1877, I still think I owe something to my father's side. thanks anyways,

http://www.arnavut.com/turkiyede.php - Those elites were not Turks only. It says here amongst 215 grand viziers during the entire Ottoman history (1299-1923), 35 of them were Albanian. Do you think Austrian based history is accurate?

Still cannot agree calling Ottomans as a heavy burden for the troubles in the decline of the empire due to the self-protection of the empire's interests by the "elite", despite the fact that all those people lived in peace for centuries and actually preserved their culture. I am sorry for what they couldn't do about the albanian language based schools. We still having the same troubles with Kurds, and making the same mistake about their language, but we do not kill them as Serbs did to albanians, or Saddam did to Kurds. I read this whole article talking only about that period: (no english translation, sorry)(http://www.arnavutum.com/modules.php?name=Kose_Yazilari&file=yazdir&sid=25). I hope everything will be much better in the future, especially with closer relationship between our countries. Thank you for keeping an eye on the article here.

Placenames in Kosovo

Hi Getoar. Please, before making or discussing changes to the names used in all Kosovo-related topics, take the time to carefully review our general naming conventions and the specific ones on geographic names, using English & settlements.

In short, they ask us to reflect common English usage (which will often be a local name, or one of them; but not always), because those are the forms our intended readership of English speakers would most easily recognize.

Furhtermore, for the specific purposes of name usage in the English Wikipedia, the language and usages of the population of Kosovo, Serbia or China are simply irrelevant. Local usage only becomes important as a tie-breaker of sorts when there's no common English usage at all. This is not often the case of Kosovo-related articles, for there was a significant amount of literature and printed material on it even before the 1999 war, and there is much, much more since 1999.

For a number of historical reasons, the English language has adopted the Serbian forms. We merely restrict ourselves to reflect this usage. Wikipedia is not a venue to advocate the adoption of the Albanian names by the English language.

Bear in mind that Wikipedia is descriptive, not prescriptive. We cannot declare what an English usage should be or will be, only what it currently is.

The names we use in the English Wikipedia will be modified only if the English usage itself changes to something else, or if our current naming conventions themselves are amended to "reflect local usage instead of English one".

If you want to change the current naming conventions of the English Wikipedia, you're free to propose your desired modifications at the appropriate talk page (for example, at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions :-) However, while the current conventions remain in place, they should be respected: they are an official policy of the English Wikipedia.

Of course, I can imagine that Kosovo's declaration of independence may well induce a change in English usages, with the Serbo-Croatian names being phased out and the Albanian ones adopted. If/when that happens, the English Wikipedia should reflect that change, but not before.

If after carefully reading the naming conventions you still have any doubts on this topic, don't hesitate to ask me about it :-) To keep discussions coherent, I would appreciate if you could post any answer here, in your talk page, please. I will see your post :-) Best regards, Ev (talk) 00:44, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo names

I am the wrong admin for the task you requested. I almost deal exclusively with images as far as my admin duties. You might see which admins are active at WP:AFD and request their assistance with the articles. -Regards Nv8200p talk 03:21, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Getoar

Hi Getoar. I'm from PR :) but currently I live in NY. I checked your contributions and I can just say great job. Where are you from?--Rinigjon (talk) 20:25, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getoar a mundesh me me tregu qysh me kthy qata?--Rinigjon (talk) 20:36, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Historia e Kosovës

hej,
duhet me ba diqka për artikullin e historisë së Kosovës se veq me revert nuk mujm me arrit kurrgjo ,ndoshta nëse provojmë të gjejmë ma shum referenca edhe ti diskutojmë ndryshimet do të jetë ma leht
Do të përpiqem ta regulloj këtë artikull por për shkak të ndryshimeve të mëdha që ndodhin po është e pamundur ,për këtë arsye mendoj që duhet t'i diskutojmë në talk page --Cradel 21:37, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I report

Hi. This is a notification message you let you know that your behavior in regards to Kosovo has been listed on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Disruption on Kosovo article, potential abusive sockpuppets. If you feel the need to say something, please do so. I would also like to further remind you that in regards to contentious articles like this one, the talk page is always your friend. Thanks, SorryGuy Talk 22:28, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In a case like this one, even if your edits are good faith, please try to develop consensus for them on the talk page. If clear consensus emerges, then your version will be kept. I would also recommend presenting what you told me to the AN/I, although I will do so for you if you do not. Thanks, SorryGuy Talk 22:37, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of AN/I, like I said, have you actively proposed and attempted to gain consensus for your proposal on the talk page? If you do so calmly and present your case for that version reasonably, I am sure it will get proper consideration. Warm regards, SorryGuy Talk 22:45, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Will you agree to ceasing making the edits until consensus for them arises, then? SorryGuy Talk 22:51, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, no.

Please do not assume that i'm on YOUR side. I'm not on ANY side except actual NPOV, which I've yet to see you support. ThuranX (talk) 22:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

your history proposal

Hi i Think your history proposal is good. it explains thoroughly the history of Kosovo from a neutral point of view and has alot more detail in it about its history than the current article has on it at the moment i think it should definitely be considered for use in the article. Gr8opinionater (talk) 23:58, 23 February 2008 (GMT).

Please leave your comment in Talk:Kosovo , thank you --Cradel 00:07, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]