User talk:Geronimo5000

January 2008

Your recent edit to Gaël (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 10:29, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Gaël

Hi! I reverted the edits done by the automatic bot - you had used too many equal signs, and it triggered the bot's response. I've also repositioned the text to a better place in the article. I've also added a short welcome message below - please have a read through of the linked articles which should help you with future editing. Any questions? Drop me a line on my Talk page. StephenBuxton (talk) 10:35, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your comments on my talk page. Whilst I am happy to receive any form of gratitude (grin) I cannot take credit for the creation of the page - that was made back in June 2005 by some anonymous editor. My sole contribution was to take your text and move it to a more appropriate position. So in fact, the thanks should be directed straight back at you - this being for expanding a very small article. So here we go.... Thanks! StephenBuxton (talk) 17:02, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Geronimo5000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! StephenBuxton (talk) 10:35, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Culham Manor

Your Culham Manor article has all the hallmarks of a copyvio. If it is, please confess now and request its deletion. Did it not occur to you that it might be an idea to state explicitly in the first sentence where the manor is? It is all good encyclopedic stuff but you could try a little harder to bring it in line with Wikipedia standards. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 01:24, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]