User talk:Germaperry01

March 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Harry Styles: Live on Tour. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Lars.Dormans (talk) 23:11, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Styles: Live on Tour

I didn't want to make a vandalism. I just wanted to make the tour dates more visible, they were hidden in the "Setlist" part. Anyway, sorry if I did something bad. Germaperry01 (talk) 23:15, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars (season 3), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. 'Scope "row" and scope "col" are required by MOS:TABLE which is the manual of style that all pages have to follow. If you remove again you may be blocked from editing further' ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 15:51, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't a threat - rather a comment. These articles have been subject to a lot of vandalism over the years. Also consistency isn't an argument. If everyone jumped off a cliff you could argue that another person doing the same thing makes it correct for consistency when in actual fact that is not the case. I only reverted cases where you removed Scope="col" or Scope="row". There may have been a small number of cases where other things were reverted by accident when these changes were undone. When leaving messages on people's talk pages assume good faith. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 22:39, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been asked to stop removing styles you don't like such as adding small text... the next time you do this, you will be recommended for a WP:TOPICBAN or WP:BAN. We have clear rules and guidelines at MOS:SMALLTEXT which clearly so Reduced or enlarged font sizes should be used sparingly, and are usually done with automated page elements such as headings, table headers, and standardized templates. It's really not difficult to understand. Use sparingly - that doesn't mean you should automatically determine what information is and isn't made small. Unless there is a very good reason, it shouldn't be done. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 15:52, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited RuPaul's Drag Race (season 1), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michelle Williams. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hi there. Edit summaries are largely meant to be useful, by describing the edit made. 'Fixed content' isn't really useful for any other editors, perhaps you could amend your practices to include more description? Thank you. Daundelin ❁ 00:47, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Fixed the future appearances section" isn't really an improvement. How did you fix the section, what did you change? That's what should be in your edit summary. Daundelin ❁ 18:49, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Trying this again. Please start using descriptive edit summaries. Daundelin ❁ 15:52, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Drag Race templates

The fact that the core purpose of the referencing in a template is to get transcluded into the season article as referencing for the season is precisely the reason why the references have to be WP:GNG-worthy third party analytical media coverage about the show in reliable sources independent of the show.

The thing you need to understand is that the referencing from the template ends up accounting for somewhere between 50 and 80 per cent of all the referencing in the season article. But because a topic's basic notability can never be demonstrated by simply primary sourcing the topic to itself, and must always be supported by GNG-worthy third party analytical media coverage in sources independent of itself, that means the season isn't being demonstrated as notable at all if 50 to 80 per cent of its references are itself rather than media coverage. So the sources in the template have to be third-party analytical media coverage, because the season article is depending on the template referencing as 50 to 80 per cent of the article's referencing.

And furthermore, part of the reason we started adding references to the templates in the first place is because people used to edit war over changing queens' placements, and would routinely claim that the episode itself "verified" whatever placement they wanted the table to reflect. So the entire point of adding references to the template in the first place was so that it was possible to verify that an independent third party recapper or analyst agreed that the episode reflected the placements that are listed in the table.

So if other seasons in other RPDR franchises are just recursively referencing the results template to the episodes themselves, rather than third party analytical recaps, then those other seasons are doing it wrong and need to be fixed by replacing the references with proper third-party media coverage. I largely leave the editing of other countries' Drag Race versions to other people, and directly concern myself only with the Canadian version, so I'm not going to do all the fixing on other versions myself -- but the referencing does have to be media coverage rather than just recursively referencing each episode to itself, and I'm not negotiating or debating any compromises on the Canadian season templates. Bearcat (talk) 15:11, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars (season 6), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mayhem Miller.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Snatch Game

Thanks for your work on Snatch Game. This page is looking better by the minute! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:19, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re: punctuation: Notes which are not complete sentences (such as "as Charity Shop Sue") should not end with periods or other punctuation marks. Thanks! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 23:32, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Boulet Brothers' Dragula, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove interlanguage link templates from Drag Race Italia.

I noticed that when you added the song for the Episode 7 lip sync that you removed the interlanguage link "ill" template for some of the other songs. This template is specifically designed to allow for a link to a page on another language wikipedia while allowing for if the song comes on to the English Language wikipedia that it be automatically replaced. See Template:ill. Naraht (talk) 08:27, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(And other Drag Race pages).Naraht (talk) 15:01, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited RuPaul's Drag Race (season 12), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]