User talk:GermanicSnake

Welcome!

Hello, GermanicSnake, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Peter Andre have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 20:05, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Hunter.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Hunter.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 17:09, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What is the easiest way to know if it is copyrighted or not?

I just typed into Google "LOVE and HATE knuckles tattoo" and seen no copyright policy on the page.--GermanicSnake (talk) 17:11, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattmarble/3870536601/

Would that be considered okay to use since it is on Flickr?--GermanicSnake (talk) 17:17, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Where can I find a non-copyrighted picture of this? It's all over the internet, I just don't want to go against any policies, sorry.--GermanicSnake (talk) 17:22, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the problem: most of the images you'll find on the internet will be screen captures from the film. That means they will be copyrighted by the movie studio. There might be some publicity stills that have fallen into the public domain, but I wouldn't hold my breath—and wherever you got them from would have to make very clear on the page what the source and history of the image is.

The best alternative may be to discuss the image at Talk:The Night of the Hunter (film) and see if other editors agree that the image adds significantly to the reader's understanding of the article. If so, then the article may be useable per the non-free content criteria. —C.Fred (talk) 17:29, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Asked on the talk page but still think it would suit the article perfectly fine, is it actually that difficult to find a non-copyrighted picture, jeez!--GermanicSnake (talk) 17:34, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Depends on the nature of the picture. For something like this, yes. This may be a case where we can use a copyrighted, non-free picture, but I want to see if other editors familiar to the film agree with this statement: "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." I'm not sure omission is detrimental; I'd like to hear from those more familiar with the film. —C.Fred (talk) 17:39, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So what are some places besides the Wiki Commons that you can get pictures that are okay to use?--GermanicSnake (talk) 19:09, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]